Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

style(action-menu): misspelled word #2431

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

betavs
Copy link
Contributor

@betavs betavs commented Oct 28, 2024

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected spelling errors in variable names related to visibility states in the dialog box component.
    • Updated class names in the action menu component to ensure proper visibility indication.
    • Renamed visableItem to visibleItem in the action menu to maintain consistency.

These changes enhance clarity and consistency across the application, improving the overall user experience.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request includes a series of modifications across multiple files, primarily focused on correcting spelling errors related to visibility states in a Vue.js component and its associated styles. Variable names such as defaultVisable, hideVisable, and btnVisable have been renamed to defaultVisible, hideVisible, and btnVisible. Additionally, a CSS class name was corrected from __item-visable to __item-visible. These changes ensure consistency in naming conventions without altering the underlying functionality of the components.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
examples/sites/demos/mobile-first/app/dialog-box/basic-usage.vue Renamed defaultVisable, hideVisable, and btnVisable to defaultVisible, hideVisible, and btnVisible.
packages/theme/src/action-menu/index.less Corrected class name from __item-visable to __item-visible in two locations.
packages/vue/src/action-menu/src/pc.vue Renamed visableItem to visibleItem, updating all references and class names accordingly.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

refactoring

Suggested reviewers

  • zzcr
  • gimmyhehe

🐇 In the code, I made a change,
To fix a spelling, it’s not so strange.
From "visable" to "visible" it went,
Now the components are clear and well-meant.
With styles aligned, the menus will shine,
Hopping along, everything's now fine! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between da0c227 and bb7c9ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • examples/sites/demos/mobile-first/app/dialog-box/basic-usage.vue (3 hunks)
  • packages/theme/src/action-menu/index.less (2 hunks)
  • packages/vue/src/action-menu/src/pc.vue (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
examples/sites/demos/mobile-first/app/dialog-box/basic-usage.vue (5)

4-6: LGTM! Consistent spelling correction in button click handlers.

The variable names have been correctly updated from *Visable to *Visible in the button click handlers.


10-12: LGTM! Consistent spelling correction in first dialog box props.

The visibility-related props have been correctly updated in the first dialog box component.


22-24: LGTM! Consistent spelling correction in second dialog box props.

The visibility-related props have been correctly updated in the second dialog box component.


32-34: LGTM! Consistent spelling correction in third dialog box props.

The visibility-related props have been correctly updated in the third dialog box component.


50-52: LGTM! Consistent spelling correction in data properties.

The data properties have been correctly renamed to use the proper spelling of "visible".

Let's verify that all instances of "visable" have been updated throughout the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

No instances of "visable" found in the codebase

The verification confirms that there are no remaining instances of the misspelled word "visable" in the codebase. The spelling correction to "visible" appears to be complete and consistent.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of misspelled "visable"
# Expect: No matches, as all instances should have been updated to "visible"

echo "Checking for any remaining instances of 'visable'..."
rg -i "visable" --type vue --type js --type ts --type css --type less

Length of output: 218


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using ripgrep without file type filters
# and then manually filter the results

echo "Checking for any remaining instances of 'visable' in all files..."
rg -i "visable" 

Length of output: 162

packages/theme/src/action-menu/index.less (2)

38-38: LGTM! Correct spelling of 'visible' in class name.

The change from __item-visable to __item-visible fixes the spelling error while maintaining the component's functionality.


86-86: LGTM! Consistent spelling correction in card mode.

The spelling correction is consistently applied in the card mode styles, maintaining naming convention consistency throughout the component.

Let's verify that all occurrences of the misspelled class have been updated:

✅ Verification successful

Spelling is correct and consistently used throughout the component

Looking at the action-menu's less file content, the class name __item-visible is correctly spelled and consistently used in both the default and card mode styles. There are no instances of misspelled "visable" in the codebase, and the naming convention is maintained properly.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of the misspelled 'visable' class
# Expected: No results, indicating all instances have been corrected

echo "Checking for any remaining misspelled classes..."
rg -i "visable" --type css --type vue

Length of output: 172


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search without file type restrictions
echo "Searching for any 'visable' occurrences in the codebase..."
rg -i "visable"

# Also search for the correct spelling to understand the context
echo -e "\nSearching for 'visible' occurrences in action-menu related files..."
rg -i "visible" -g "*action-menu*"

Length of output: 1360


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific action-menu styles and component files
echo "Checking action-menu related style files..."
fd -e less -e css "action-menu" --exec cat {}

# Also check for any Vue component files related to action-menu
echo -e "\nChecking action-menu component files..."
fd "action-menu" -e vue --exec cat {}

Length of output: 279


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more specific path-based search since we know the file location
echo "Checking the specific action-menu less file content..."
cat packages/theme/src/action-menu/index.less

# Also check for any related class names in the codebase
echo -e "\nSearching for action-menu class related patterns..."
rg "__item-" -g "*action-menu*"

Length of output: 2791

packages/vue/src/action-menu/src/pc.vue (4)

5-5: LGTM: Correct spelling in v-for directive

The variable rename from visableItem to visibleItem improves code clarity.


14-18: LGTM: Consistent variable usage in props

The prop bindings have been correctly updated to use the properly spelled visibleItem variable, maintaining consistency with the v-for directive change.


9-10: Verify CSS class name update

The class name correction from tiny-action-menu__item-visable to tiny-action-menu__item-visible looks good, but let's verify the corresponding CSS file has been updated.

✅ Verification successful

The previous search didn't yield results, so let's broaden our search to:

  1. Find if the new class name exists in CSS files
  2. Locate relevant CSS files for the action-menu component to verify the changes

Let's try to:

  1. Find any CSS/SCSS files containing action-menu related styles
  2. Look for specifically named action-menu style files
  3. Check if the styles are defined within the Vue component itself

We found the relevant style files. Let's check their contents to verify if the CSS class names are properly defined and if there are any remaining instances of the misspelled version.


CSS class name change is correctly implemented

The class name tiny-action-menu__item-visible is properly defined in the theme's Less file and there are no remaining instances of the misspelled visable version. The CSS implementation in packages/theme/src/action-menu/index.less correctly uses the new spelling for styling the visible menu items.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the CSS class name has been updated in all theme files
# and there are no remaining instances of the misspelled version

# Search for any remaining instances of the misspelled class name
rg "item-visable" --type css

Length of output: 28


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for both old and new class names in CSS files to understand the changes
echo "Searching for the new class name (item-visible):"
rg "item-visible" --type css -C 2

echo -e "\nSearching for any CSS files related to action-menu:"
fd "action-menu.*\.css"

Length of output: 285


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching in theme files and with different patterns
echo "Searching in all files for action-menu styles:"
fd . --type f -e scss -e css | xargs rg -l "action-menu"

echo -e "\nSearching for the component's style file structure:"
fd . -t f | rg -i "action-menu.*\.(css|scss|less)$"

echo -e "\nChecking Vue file for style section:"
cat "packages/vue/src/action-menu/src/pc.vue" | rg -A 20 "<style"

Length of output: 620


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the theme files we found
echo "Checking theme/src/action-menu/index.less:"
cat "packages/theme/src/action-menu/index.less"

echo -e "\nChecking theme-saas/src/action-menu/index.less:"
cat "packages/theme-saas/src/action-menu/index.less"

# Also search for any class with 'visable' to ensure no misspellings remain
echo -e "\nChecking for any remaining 'visable' occurrences:"
rg "visable" --type less

Length of output: 2926


Line range hint 1-143: Verify complete removal of misspelling

Let's ensure no instances of "visable" remain anywhere in the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

No instances of "visable" found in the codebase

The verification scripts confirm that there are no instances of the misspelled word "visable" in any files, including .vue files. The correct spelling "visible" is being used consistently in the code.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining instances of the misspelled word
# in all relevant file types

# Search for any remaining instances of "visable"
rg -i "visable" --type vue --type ts --type js --type css

Length of output: 85


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of "visable" in all files
# Using ripgrep without file type filters since vue type is not recognized
rg -i "visable"

# Also search specifically in .vue files using find and grep as fallback
find . -name "*.vue" -type f -exec grep -i "visable" {} \;

Length of output: 77


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

[e2e-test-warn]
The component to be tested is missing.

The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug".

Please make sure you've read our contributing guide

@kagol kagol added the documentation 对文档的改进或补充 label Oct 28, 2024
@zzcr zzcr merged commit ccd9ce6 into opentiny:dev Nov 12, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation 对文档的改进或补充
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants