fix(divider): [divider] modify e2e test cases for the divider component #2766
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves updating test cases for the Divider component across multiple specification files. The changes focus on modifying test case names, removing previous interaction-based tests, and introducing new assertions that verify text content, CSS properties, and visual characteristics of divider elements. The tests now emphasize direct validation of divider components' attributes using Playwright's testing framework, with a shift towards more precise and targeted testing approaches. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
WalkthroughThis PR modifies the end-to-end (e2e) test cases for the divider component in the Tiny Vue project. The changes involve updating test descriptions and assertions to verify CSS properties and text content, ensuring the divider component behaves as expected in various scenarios. Changes
|
![petercat-assistant[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/875736?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test' | ||
|
|
||
| test('基本用法', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that the page error listener is correctly handling exceptions. If any exceptions are expected, they should be explicitly handled or documented.
| @@ -1,12 +1,10 @@ | |||
| import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test' | |||
|
|
|||
| test('Divider 文案位置', async ({ page }) => { | |||
| test('分割线文案位置', async ({ page }) => { | |||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that the page error listener is correctly handling exceptions. If any exceptions are expected, they should be explicitly handled or documented.
| @@ -1,19 +1,12 @@ | |||
| // divider#custom-style | |||
| import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test' | |||
|
|
|||
| test('Divider 样式', async ({ page }) => { | |||
| test('自定义样式', async ({ page }) => { | |||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that the page error listener is correctly handling exceptions. If any exceptions are expected, they should be explicitly handled or documented.
| @@ -1,12 +1,10 @@ | |||
| // divider#custom-style | |||
| import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test' | |||
|
|
|||
| test('Divider 分隔线', async ({ page }) => { | |||
| test('垂直分割线', async ({ page }) => { | |||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that the page error listener is correctly handling exceptions. If any exceptions are expected, they should be explicitly handled or documented.
| import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test' | ||
|
|
||
| test('分割线类型', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that the page error listener is correctly handling exceptions. If any exceptions are expected, they should be explicitly handled or documented.
| import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test' | ||
|
|
||
| test('分割线状态', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that the page error listener is correctly handling exceptions. If any exceptions are expected, they should be explicitly handled or documented.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/basic-usage.spec.ts (2)
6-6: Simplify the CSS selector for better maintainabilityThe current selector
.tiny-divider .tiny-divider--default, .tiny-divider.tiny-divider--defaultis complex and could be fragile. Consider using a more specific and simpler selector.- const dividerCss = page.locator('.tiny-divider .tiny-divider--default, .tiny-divider.tiny-divider--default') + const dividerCss = page.locator('.tiny-divider--default')
3-8: Consider adding more test cases for basic usageThe current test only verifies the border color. Consider adding tests for:
- Height/width of the divider
- Margin/padding
- Visibility/display properties
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/direction.spec.ts (1)
4-10: Enhance vertical divider test coverageWhile the current test checks basic properties, consider adding:
- Height verification
- Tests for multiple vertical dividers
- Spacing between vertical dividers
- Responsive behavior tests
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/divider-type.spec.ts (1)
1-1: Overall feedback on the e2e test implementationWhile the tests provide basic coverage for the divider component, there are several areas for improvement:
- Avoid hardcoded pixel values in position tests
- Add comprehensive style verification
- Include responsive layout testing
- Enhance test coverage for different scenarios
Additionally, consider adding test cases for:
- Edge cases (very long text, empty text)
- Accessibility testing
- Different viewport sizes
- RTL support
Would you like me to provide example implementations for any of these suggestions?
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/custom-style.spec.ts (1)
8-11: Consider using test.describe for better organization.The assertions could be grouped logically using test.describe blocks for better readability and maintenance.
Example structure:
test.describe('Custom Style Divider', () => { test('should display correct text labels', async ({ page }) => { // existing text assertions }) test('should apply custom styles correctly', async ({ page }) => { // new style assertions }) })examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/status.spec.ts (1)
7-11: Consider data-driven test approach.The repetitive assertions could be simplified using a data-driven approach.
Refactor using test.each:
const statusTests = [ { index: 0, text: 'default', color: 'rgb(220, 223, 230)' }, { index: 1, text: 'success', color: 'rgb(103, 194, 58)' }, { index: 2, text: 'error', color: 'rgb(245, 108, 108)' }, { index: 3, text: 'warning', color: 'rgb(230, 162, 60)' }, { index: 4, text: 'info', color: 'rgb(144, 147, 153)' } ] test.describe('Divider Status', () => { for (const { index, text, color } of statusTests) { test(`should render ${text} status correctly`, async ({ page }) => { await page.goto('divider#status') const dividerText = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text').nth(index) const divider = page.locator('.tiny-divider').nth(index) await expect(dividerText).toHaveText(text) await expect(divider).toHaveCSS('border-color', color) await expect(divider).toHaveAttribute('role', 'separator') }) } })
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/basic-usage.spec.ts(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/content-position.spec.ts(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/custom-style.spec.ts(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/direction.spec.ts(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/divider-type.spec.ts(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/status.spec.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: PR E2E Test (pnpm test:e2e3)
| await expect(left.first()).toHaveCSS('left', '133px') | ||
| await expect(left.nth(1)).toHaveCSS('left', '304.5px') | ||
| await expect(left.nth(2)).toHaveCSS('right', '80px') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid hardcoded pixel values in position tests
Using fixed pixel values (133px, 304.5px, 80px) makes the tests brittle and susceptible to failure with different viewport sizes or styling changes. Consider:
- Testing relative positioning instead
- Using viewport-relative calculations
- Adding viewport size setup in the test
Example approach:
test('分割线文案位置', async ({ page }) => {
await page.setViewportSize({ width: 800, height: 600 });
// ... rest of the test
await expect(left.first()).toHaveCSS('position', 'absolute');
await expect(left.first()).toHaveCSS('text-align', 'left');
// ... similar checks for center and right
});| test('分割线类型', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('divider#divider-type') | ||
| const dividerText = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text') | ||
| await expect(dividerText.first()).toHaveText('solid线') | ||
| await expect(dividerText.nth(1)).toHaveText('dashed线') | ||
| await expect(dividerText.nth(2)).toHaveText('dotted线') | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add style verification for different divider types
The test only verifies text content but doesn't check the actual line styles. Add assertions for:
- Border styles (solid, dashed, dotted)
- Line thickness
- Color consistency
Example additions:
const divider = page.locator('.tiny-divider').first();
await expect(divider).toHaveCSS('border-style', 'solid');
const dashedDivider = page.locator('.tiny-divider').nth(1);
await expect(dashedDivider).toHaveCSS('border-style', 'dashed');
const dottedDivider = page.locator('.tiny-divider').nth(2);
await expect(dottedDivider).toHaveCSS('border-style', 'dotted');| test('自定义样式', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('divider#custom-style') | ||
| await page.getByText('自定义分隔线颜色').click() | ||
| await page.locator('.tiny-divider').first().click() | ||
| await page.getByText('自定义分隔线的样式').click() | ||
| await page.locator('.pc-demo > div:nth-child(4)').click() | ||
| await page.getByText('自定义文案的颜色').click() | ||
| await page | ||
| .locator('div') | ||
| .filter({ hasText: /^文案$/ }) | ||
| .first() | ||
| .click() | ||
| await page.getByText('文案的背景颜色', { exact: true }).click() | ||
| await page.getByText('文案', { exact: true }).nth(1).click() | ||
| const dividerText = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding visual validation for custom styles.
While validating text content is good, this test for custom styles should also verify the actual CSS properties being customized (font color, background, font size, height, and margins).
Add visual validation, for example:
test('自定义样式', async ({ page }) => {
page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull())
await page.goto('divider#custom-style')
const dividerText = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text')
+ // Verify custom font color
+ await expect(dividerText.first()).toHaveCSS('color', 'rgb(64, 158, 255)')
+ // Verify custom background
+ await expect(dividerText.nth(1)).toHaveCSS('background-color', 'rgb(240, 249, 235)')
+ // Verify custom font size
+ await expect(dividerText.nth(2)).toHaveCSS('font-size', '20px')
+ // Verify custom height and margin
+ const divider = page.locator('.tiny-divider').nth(3)
+ await expect(divider).toHaveCSS('margin', '32px 0')📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| test('自定义样式', async ({ page }) => { | |
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | |
| await page.goto('divider#custom-style') | |
| await page.getByText('自定义分隔线颜色').click() | |
| await page.locator('.tiny-divider').first().click() | |
| await page.getByText('自定义分隔线的样式').click() | |
| await page.locator('.pc-demo > div:nth-child(4)').click() | |
| await page.getByText('自定义文案的颜色').click() | |
| await page | |
| .locator('div') | |
| .filter({ hasText: /^文案$/ }) | |
| .first() | |
| .click() | |
| await page.getByText('文案的背景颜色', { exact: true }).click() | |
| await page.getByText('文案', { exact: true }).nth(1).click() | |
| const dividerText = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text') | |
| test('自定义样式', async ({ page }) => { | |
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | |
| await page.goto('divider#custom-style') | |
| const dividerText = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text') | |
| // Verify custom font color | |
| await expect(dividerText.first()).toHaveCSS('color', 'rgb(64, 158, 255)') | |
| // Verify custom background | |
| await expect(dividerText.nth(1)).toHaveCSS('background-color', 'rgb(240, 249, 235)') | |
| // Verify custom font size | |
| await expect(dividerText.nth(2)).toHaveCSS('font-size', '20px') | |
| // Verify custom height and margin | |
| const divider = page.locator('.tiny-divider').nth(3) | |
| await expect(divider).toHaveCSS('margin', '32px 0') |
| test('分割线状态', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('divider#status') | ||
| const dividerText = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for status-specific styles and accessibility.
The test only verifies text content but should also validate status-specific visual styles and accessibility attributes.
Add style and accessibility validation:
test('分割线状态', async ({ page }) => {
page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull())
await page.goto('divider#status')
const dividerText = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text')
+ const dividers = page.locator('.tiny-divider')
+
+ // Status-specific color validation
+ await expect(dividers.nth(1)).toHaveCSS('border-color', 'rgb(103, 194, 58)') // success
+ await expect(dividers.nth(2)).toHaveCSS('border-color', 'rgb(245, 108, 108)') // error
+ await expect(dividers.nth(3)).toHaveCSS('border-color', 'rgb(230, 162, 60)') // warning
+ await expect(dividers.nth(4)).toHaveCSS('border-color', 'rgb(144, 147, 153)') // info
+
+ // Accessibility validation
+ for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
+ await expect(dividers.nth(i)).toHaveAttribute('role', 'separator')
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| test('分割线状态', async ({ page }) => { | |
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | |
| await page.goto('divider#status') | |
| const dividerText = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text') | |
| test('分割线状态', async ({ page }) => { | |
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | |
| await page.goto('divider#status') | |
| const dividerText = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text') | |
| const dividers = page.locator('.tiny-divider') | |
| // Status-specific color validation | |
| await expect(dividers.nth(1)).toHaveCSS('border-color', 'rgb(103, 194, 58)') // success | |
| await expect(dividers.nth(2)).toHaveCSS('border-color', 'rgb(245, 108, 108)') // error | |
| await expect(dividers.nth(3)).toHaveCSS('border-color', 'rgb(230, 162, 60)') // warning | |
| await expect(dividers.nth(4)).toHaveCSS('border-color', 'rgb(144, 147, 153)') // info | |
| // Accessibility validation | |
| for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) { | |
| await expect(dividers.nth(i)).toHaveAttribute('role', 'separator') | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/content-position.spec.ts (1)
3-3: Add JSDoc documentation for the test case.Since documentation updates are marked as incomplete in the PR objectives, consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the test's purpose and expectations.
+/** + * Tests the text positioning functionality of the divider component. + * Validates: + * - Left-aligned text with 20% offset + * - Center-aligned text + * - Right-aligned text + */ test('分割线文案位置', async ({ page }) => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/content-position.spec.ts(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/custom-style.spec.ts(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/divider-type.spec.ts(1 hunks)examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/status.spec.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/status.spec.ts
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/custom-style.spec.ts
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/divider-type.spec.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: PR Unit Test
- GitHub Check: PR E2E Test (pnpm test:e2e3)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/divider/content-position.spec.ts (2)
4-4: Enhance error handling in the page error listener.The current error handler silently expects all exceptions to be null. This makes debugging test failures more difficult.
3-5: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd viewport setup for consistent testing.
The test lacks viewport size configuration, which could lead to inconsistent results across different test environments.
Add viewport setup before navigation:
test('分割线文案位置', async ({ page }) => { + await page.setViewportSize({ width: 1280, height: 720 }) page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) await page.goto('divider#content-position')Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| const left = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text') | ||
| await expect(left.first()).toHaveText('左侧且偏移20%') | ||
| await expect(left.nth(1)).toHaveText('中间') | ||
| await expect(left.nth(2)).toHaveCSS('right', '80px') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve test robustness and consistency.
Several issues need attention:
- The locator is too generic and could match unintended elements
- Hardcoded pixel values make the test brittle
- Inconsistent validation approach between elements
Consider this more robust approach:
- const left = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text')
- await expect(left.first()).toHaveText('左侧且偏移20%')
- await expect(left.nth(1)).toHaveText('中间')
- await expect(left.nth(2)).toHaveCSS('right', '80px')
+ // More specific locators
+ const leftDivider = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text[style*="left"]')
+ const centerDivider = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text[style*="center"]')
+ const rightDivider = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text[style*="right"]')
+
+ // Validate text content
+ await expect(leftDivider).toHaveText('左侧且偏移20%')
+ await expect(centerDivider).toHaveText('中间')
+
+ // Validate positioning
+ await expect(leftDivider).toHaveCSS('position', 'absolute')
+ await expect(leftDivider).toHaveCSS('left', '20%')
+ await expect(centerDivider).toHaveCSS('position', 'absolute')
+ await expect(centerDivider).toHaveCSS('left', '50%')
+ await expect(rightDivider).toHaveCSS('position', 'absolute')
+ await expect(rightDivider).toHaveCSS('right', expect.stringMatching(/\d+%/))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const left = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text') | |
| await expect(left.first()).toHaveText('左侧且偏移20%') | |
| await expect(left.nth(1)).toHaveText('中间') | |
| await expect(left.nth(2)).toHaveCSS('right', '80px') | |
| // More specific locators | |
| const leftDivider = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text[style*="left"]') | |
| const centerDivider = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text[style*="center"]') | |
| const rightDivider = page.locator('.tiny-divider__text[style*="right"]') | |
| // Validate text content | |
| await expect(leftDivider).toHaveText('左侧且偏移20%') | |
| await expect(centerDivider).toHaveText('中间') | |
| // Validate positioning | |
| await expect(leftDivider).toHaveCSS('position', 'absolute') | |
| await expect(leftDivider).toHaveCSS('left', '20%') | |
| await expect(centerDivider).toHaveCSS('position', 'absolute') | |
| await expect(centerDivider).toHaveCSS('left', '50%') | |
| await expect(rightDivider).toHaveCSS('position', 'absolute') | |
| await expect(rightDivider).toHaveCSS('right', expect.stringMatching(/\d+%/)) |
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
modify e2e test cases for the divider component
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Tests
Documentation
The release focuses on comprehensive testing of the Divider component across various configurations and visual properties.