Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed xfail for tinyllama_data_aware_gptq_backend_OV #2951

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alexsu52
Copy link
Contributor

@alexsu52 alexsu52 commented Sep 5, 2024

Changes

#2784 contains a fix that makes the layered scheduler deterministic.

Reason for changes

The test has become stable.

Related tickets

ref: 148819

Tests

11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-11900K @ 3.50GHz /ptq_single_model/11067/
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz /ptq_single_model/11075/

@github-actions github-actions bot added the NNCF PTQ Pull requests that updates NNCF PTQ label Sep 5, 2024
@alexsu52 alexsu52 requested a review from l-bat September 30, 2024 11:55
@alexsu52 alexsu52 marked this pull request as ready for review September 30, 2024 11:55
@alexsu52 alexsu52 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 30, 2024 11:55
@alexsu52 alexsu52 marked this pull request as draft September 30, 2024 12:05
@alexsu52 alexsu52 removed the request for review from l-bat September 30, 2024 12:05
@l-bat
Copy link
Collaborator

l-bat commented Sep 30, 2024

Do we also need to remove the xfail marker from tests/post_training/data/wc_reference_data_2024.5.yaml?

@alexsu52
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do we also need to remove the xfail marker from tests/post_training/data/wc_reference_data_2024.5.yaml?

I found a bug in the builds, so I made a PR request as a draft again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NNCF PTQ Pull requests that updates NNCF PTQ
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants