Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use invitation key for connection query #1570

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 21, 2021

Conversation

TimoGlastra
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Timo Glastra timo@animo.id

Invitation key was not taken into account for get connections endpoint.

If possible, would like to get this in the upcoming 0.7.3 release :)

Signed-off-by: Timo Glastra <timo@animo.id>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 21, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1570 (8c1470e) into main (953fd32) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1570   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.76%   95.76%           
=======================================
  Files         527      527           
  Lines       32312    32312           
=======================================
  Hits        30942    30942           
  Misses       1370     1370           

Copy link
Contributor

@shaangill025 shaangill025 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/connections endpoint's invitation_key filter now working as intended.

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
import json

from unittest.mock import ANY
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Neat, I learned a new trick

@andrewwhitehead andrewwhitehead merged commit cd5588f into main Dec 21, 2021
@andrewwhitehead andrewwhitehead deleted the fix/connection-invitation-key branch December 21, 2021 18:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants