Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix demo for oob #779

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 24, 2022

Conversation

TimoGlastra
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Timo Glastra timo@animo.id

Signed-off-by: Timo Glastra <timo@animo.id>
@TimoGlastra TimoGlastra requested a review from a team as a code owner May 19, 2022 10:34
@TimoGlastra TimoGlastra mentioned this pull request May 19, 2022
33 tasks
@TimoGlastra TimoGlastra added this to the v0.2.0 milestone May 19, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #779 (82be267) into main (c8ca091) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #779   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.53%   87.53%           
=======================================
  Files         435      435           
  Lines       10670    10670           
  Branches     1891     1891           
=======================================
  Hits         9340     9340           
  Misses       1268     1268           
  Partials       62       62           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c8ca091...82be267. Read the comment docs.

throw Error(redText(Output.MissingConnectionRecord))
}

const [connection] = await this.agent.connections.findAllByOutOfBandId(this.outOfBandId)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks to me like we want a find single in the public api aswell.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well there could be multiple, so not sure we should add that method. For demo purposes it's fine to pick the first one I guess

@TimoGlastra TimoGlastra enabled auto-merge (squash) May 24, 2022 12:58
@TimoGlastra TimoGlastra merged commit 5b42e6c into openwallet-foundation:main May 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants