make 'input:' optional in call body #524
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I like this idea. Less is more. I like how it is optional too, having maximal backwards-compatibility where possible is the only way forward. When WDL 2.0 eventually launches I don't want it to become the python 3.0 disaster where only the core devs are on the new stuff and the rest of the world waits for 10+ years. |
|
I love this idea too. I have always felt that in lieu of other properties it was just added boilerplate to the call definition. @mlin are you able to take a stab at updating the grammar bychance? |
|
@mlin please change target to |
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just scratching a holiday itch....the
input:heading in call bodies is useless clutter AFAICT. Make it optional (for backwards compatibility).Perhaps the idea was for call bodies to have additional sections (e.g.
runtime:for workflow-level overrides). Those could still be added in the future, whilst keepinginput:implied if not present.Checklist