allow characters for lte and gte in a few contexts #1099
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dpvc
reviewed
Aug 20, 2024
|
Yeah, sorry. I was manually copy-pasting from where I have this in my production server and messed that up. I'll fix it soon. |
drgrice1
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2024
somiaj
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2024
|
I will merge this with two approvals. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is so a student can directly enter ≤ and ≥ in contexts where
<=and>=are valid operators.It affects a bit more than just the two files here, because at least one context (Inequality-SetBuilder) is built on top of
contextInequalities.pl.