Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

netatalk: Update to 4.0.2 #25195

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

netatalk: Update to 4.0.2 #25195

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

APCCV
Copy link
Contributor

@APCCV APCCV commented Oct 24, 2024

Maintainer: Antonio Pastor / @APCCV
Compile tested: ipq806x (23.05.3 & snapshot)
Run tested: ipq806x - C2600: start server, connect from MacOS, read/write files to home share, create/update TimeMachine backups

Description:
No changes to package or functionality beyond using latest available upstream code base and updating Makefile.
Starting Netatalk 4.x build uses meson instead of autotools.

Maintainer: Antonio Pastor / @APCCV
Compile tested: ipq806x (23.05.3, snapshot)
Run tested: ipq806x - C2600: start server, connect from MacOS, read/write files to home share, create/update TimeMachine backups

Description:
No changes to package other than using latest available upstream code base. Starting Netatalk 4.x build uses meson instead of autotools.

Signed-off-by: Antonio Pastor <antonio.pastor@gmail.com>
@APCCV
Copy link
Contributor Author

APCCV commented Oct 24, 2024

Darn. The thing builds fine with the SDK.
Ah, and the thing builds fine on an Ubuntu variant... because the meson.build file finds what it needs outside the SDK.
Let's see how to fix... might just close this one and do a new PR.

@APCCV APCCV closed this Oct 25, 2024
@APCCV APCCV deleted the netatalk branch October 25, 2024 04:00
@Neustradamus
Copy link

Replaced by Netatalk 4.0.4:

Original PRs in master:

24.10 backport:

This was referenced Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants