openthread-br: bump source to 2024-11-20 and add missing dependencies

[itay-sho]

Maintainer: @stintel
Compile tested: armsr/armv8/generic, and banana pi r4. both aarch64
Run tested: armsr/armv8/generic, and banana pi r4. both aarch64
I tested it until I saw that the service is up (and not crashing) as it was before

Description:
bumped ot-br-posix that openthread-br is based on to latest code.
the major changes required some more compilation flags, and in order to avoid the ot-br agent had to add some dependencies as weell.

dependencies:

1. kmod-tun: otherwise the otbr fails to load and crashed immidiedtly

compilation flags:

1. OTBR_NAT64, OT_NAT64_BORDER_ROUTING: a temporary workaround to a compilation problem with openwrt. there is an issue I've opened about it here: Failing to compile to openwrt openthread/ot-br-posix#2606
2. OT_TARGET_OPENWRT: wasn't assumed from OTBR_OPENWRT in banana pi r4 (but was in the other target). decided to add it to avoid problem

[stintel]

I'll have to investigate this properly. I cannot believe avahi is needed and I absolutely do not want to add that dependency. Unfortunately I am renovating my house and this will have to wait. To anyone with merge privileges on this repository: do not merge this until further notice.

[itay-sho]

I'll have to investigate this properly. I cannot believe avahi is needed and I absolutely do not want to add that dependency. Unfortunately I am renovating my house and this will have to wait. To anyone with merge privileges on this repository: do not merge this until further notice.

There is a possibility that adding OT_TARGET_OPENWRT removed avahi client as a mandatory dependency for this. Both were required only on my bpi4 target (and not the other qemu arm target). it did compile a little different after adding it.

Would you like me to check?

[stintel]

I'll have to investigate this properly. I cannot believe avahi is needed and I absolutely do not want to add that dependency. Unfortunately I am renovating my house and this will have to wait. To anyone with merge privileges on this repository: do not merge this until further notice.

There is a possibility that adding OT_TARGET_OPENWRT removed avahi client as a mandatory dependency for this. Both were required only on my bpi4 target (and not the other qemu arm target). it did compile a little different after adding it.

Would you like me to check?

Please do. I really don't want avahi and dbus as dependency of this package.

[itay-sho]

After removing libavahi and enabling OT_TARGET_OPENWRT, the compilation was successful.
The commit was recreated without libavahi-client as a dependency.
Additionally, the ot-br-posix version was bumped to include the latest commits made since I began working on this.

wdyt?

[neheb]

Meh I bought 2 USB sticks to test with this. Never got around to it...

[stintel]

I will try to test this over the weekend. I am using 3 nanoleaf essential bulbs, an EVE energy, and an Aqara U200 smart lock on my OpenWrt Thread network. If these keep working I'll accept the PR.

[stintel]

Could you fix the test formalities failure though?

: Signed-off-by is missing or doesn't match author (should be 'Signed-off-by: Itay Shoshani itai.sho@gmail.com')

[stintel]

And maybe add some of the reasoning you mentioned in the comments for changes in the commit message.

[itay-sho]

Worked on the changes you talked about
Can you take a look?

[stintel]

Had guests over the weekend, but just tested this and can't spot any immediate regressions.