Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenX adapter: update documentation #52

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

marcin-wrobel-ox
Copy link

Type of change

  • Other

Description of change

Update documentation about the deprecated bid param platform.
Add a hint to use Price Floor Module instead of customFloor param.

@kenan-gillet
Copy link

@marcin-wrobel-ox you may want to against master, this is unreviewable

@marcin-wrobel-ox marcin-wrobel-ox changed the base branch from master to 3.24.0-openx-adapter December 1, 2022 16:48
@marcin-wrobel-ox marcin-wrobel-ox changed the base branch from 3.24.0-openx-adapter to master December 1, 2022 16:48
| `coppa` | optional | Boolean | Enables Child's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) regulations. | true
| Name | Scope | Type | Description | Example
|---------------------------------| ----- | ---- |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -------
| `delDomain` ~~or `platform`~~** | required | String | OpenX delivery domain provided by your OpenX representative. | "PUBLISHER-d.openx.net"
Copy link

@kenan-gillet kenan-gillet Dec 1, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are we deprecating platform?
obviously it was

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would actually have deprecated the delDomain because people always mess up with the UI domain name
also neither are really needed per se because adunit is unique across platform anyway

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

true, I saw numerous ad requests with ui domain instead of del domain

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kenan-gillet @marcin-wrobel-ox actually i believe @lambdarho was telling me that delDomain is actually preferred because using platform does not cookie sync as well

| `delDomain` ~~or `platform`~~** | required | String | OpenX delivery domain provided by your OpenX representative. | "PUBLISHER-d.openx.net"
| `unit` | required | String | OpenX ad unit ID provided by your OpenX representative. | "1611023122"
| `customParams` | optional | Object | User-defined targeting key-value pairs. customParams applies to a specific unit. | `{key1: "v1", key2: ["v2","v3"]}`
| `customFloor` | optional | Number | Minimum price in USD. customFloor applies to a specific unit. For example, use the following value to set a $1.50 floor: 1.50 <br/><br/> **WARNING:**<br/> Misuse of this parameter can impact revenue<br/><br/>Note: OpenX suggests using the [Price Floor Module](https://docs.prebid.org/dev-docs/modules/floors.html) instead of customFloor. The Price Floor Module will be prioritized over customFloor if both are present. | 1.50

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will be prioritized is it true now or in the future ?
if true now, is prioritized instead of will be prioritized seems less ambiguous

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good point, it is already happening, since PR was merged in an upstream I will keep in mind to change it next time

@marcin-wrobel-ox
Copy link
Author

It was merged to upstream, so closing this

@marcin-wrobel-ox marcin-wrobel-ox deleted the chore/update-doc branch December 1, 2022 23:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants