bugfix: service topology filter can not work when hub agent work on cloud mode

[rambohe-ch]

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespace from that line:
/kind bug
/kind documentation
/kind enhancement
/kind good-first-issue
/kind feature
/kind question
/kind design
/sig ai
/sig iot
/sig network
/sig storage
/sig storage

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

1. service topology filter can not work when hub agent work on cloud mode
   --> solution: service topology filter will list/watch node from kube-apsierver if working mode is cloud

2. optimize shared informers register. extract all of informers register and
   make a common function named registerInformers

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #600

Special notes for your reviewer:

/assign @DrmagicE

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

other Note

[openyurt-bot]

@rambohe-ch: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: your_reviewer.

Note that only openyurtio members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time.
For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespace from that line:
/kind bug
/kind documentation
/kind enhancement
/kind good-first-issue
/kind feature
/kind question
/kind design
/sig ai
/sig iot
/sig network
/sig storage
/sig storage

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

1. service topology filter can not work when hub agent work on cloud mode
   --> solution: service topology filter will list/watch node from kube-apsierver if working mode is cloud

2. optimize shared informers register. extract all of informers register and
   make a common function named registerInformers

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #600

Special notes for your reviewer:

/assign @DrmagicE

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

other Note

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openyurt-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rambohe-ch

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [rambohe-ch]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[DrmagicE]

/lgtm