[0.8.5 too] was 0.8.4 dkms won't compile unless I remove 0.8.3 folder from /var/lib/dkms/zfs/ #10463
Labels
Component: Packaging
custom packages
Comments
|
Ran into the exact same issue, removing |
|
I remember having that problem with other dkms modules. |
Germano0
changed the title
|
it's happening also with 0.8.5 not compiling unless I remove 0.8.4 folder |
|
This still happens without fail every single ZFS and kernel upgrade on Fedora 33. Yesterday I did a regular upgrade, which broke ZFS:
On the following boot, dkms.service output the following logs: Looking at /var/lib/dkms/zfs there's a whole lot of stale broken symlinks left behind, as well as the old source dir for 2.0.3: The problem is the existence of the 2.0.3 directory (/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.0.3), which was evidently not correctly cleaned up. I can manually work around the problem by running: But obviously it's not a reasonable expectation for users to be doing this. |
|
This happened to me again last night on Fedora 35. The sequence of events that led up to it were:
Even though the problem only triggered on the kernel upgrade, I think the root cause happened during the zfs-dkms upgrade, where it failed to clean up the old /var/lib/dkms/zfs/$old_version directory. The issue is still reliably reproducible, so it definitely has not been fixed. |
|
Still happens with |
|
Having a bit of a poke around, it seems the
So yeah, very broken. |
|
After looking into the history of this issue, which has surfaced multiple times (#8160, dell/dkms#25, #6902, etc.), I am convinced the complexity of the existing scripts are not justified with the simplicity of the problem. I think a more reliable solution is actually quite minimal: Notes:
|
jeremyvisser
added a commit
to jeremyvisser/zfs
that referenced
this issue
Mar 8, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Fixes openzfs#10463.
jeremyvisser
added a commit
to jeremyvisser/zfs
that referenced
this issue
Mar 8, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Fixes openzfs#10463.
jeremyvisser
added a commit
to jeremyvisser/zfs
that referenced
this issue
Mar 8, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Fixes openzfs#10463.
15 tasks
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
to tonyhutter/zfs
that referenced
this issue
Mar 24, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Fixes openzfs#10463.
behlendorf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes #10463
Closes #13182
mcmilk
pushed a commit
to mcmilk/zfs
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
nicman23
pushed a commit
to nicman23/zfs
that referenced
this issue
Aug 22, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
nicman23
pushed a commit
to nicman23/zfs
that referenced
this issue
Aug 22, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
lundman
pushed a commit
to openzfsonwindows/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 2, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
beren12
pushed a commit
to beren12/zfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 19, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
andrewc12
pushed a commit
to andrewc12/openzfs
that referenced
this issue
Sep 23, 2022
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
to tonyhutter/zfs
that referenced
this issue
Jun 8, 2023
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes openzfs#10463
Closes openzfs#13182
behlendorf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 9, 2023
Two problems led to unexpected behaviour of the scriptlets:
1) Newer DKMS versions change the formatting of "dkms status":
(old) zfs, 2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
(new) zfs/2.1.2, 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64, x86_64: installed
Which broke a conditional determining whether to uninstall.
2) zfs_config.h not packaged properly, but was attempted to be read
in the %preun scriptlet:
CONFIG_H="/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.2/*/*/zfs_config.h"
Which broke the uninstallation of the module, which left behind a
dangling symlink, which broke DKMS entirely with this error:
Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file.
File: /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.1/source/dkms.conf does not exist.
This change attempts to simplify life by:
* Avoiding parsing anything (less prone to future breakage)
* Uses %posttrans instead of %post for module installation, because
%post happens before %preun, while %posttrans happens afterwards
* Unconditionally reinstall module on upgrade, which is less
efficient but the trade-off is that it's more reliable
Alternative approaches could involve fixing the existing parsing bugs
or improving the logic, but this comes at the cost of complexity and
possible future bugs.
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <hutter2@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Visser <jeremyvisser@google.com>
Closes #10463
Closes #13182
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
System information
Describe the problem you're observing
I updated to CentOS 8.2 and ZFS 0.8.4, so after the reboot I had to reload ZFS module (due #10462) so I ran
to fix this error I tried
Since it is a kind of error I have seen on other packages like Wireguard, I knew that if after an package update,
dkms autoinstallfailed, I have to remove the older folder in/var/lib/dkms, so I did it:and then the machine started to compile the new module
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: