-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
clone+mmap+write trips assert: VERIFY(arc_released(db->db_buf)) failed at dbuf.c:2150:dbuf_redirty() #15654
Comments
@pjd @oromenahar @amotin FYI. Dunno if I'll have time to get to this soon. |
I was unable to reproduce this panic on FreeBSD due to EFAULT returned by zfs_uio_fault_move() before that, causing understood and probably unrelated data corruption, that I reproduced with this test originally. But I've got a hint that setting |
I think I found the problem. See #15656 . |
Thanks for converting this into a smaller + better reproducer and official issue! |
Block cloning normally creates dirty record without dr_data. But if the block is read after cloning, it is moved into DB_CACHED state and receives the data buffer. If after that we call dbuf_unoverride() to convert the dirty record into normal write, we should give it the data buffer from dbuf and release one. Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes #15654 Closes #15656
Block cloning normally creates dirty record without dr_data. But if the block is read after cloning, it is moved into DB_CACHED state and receives the data buffer. If after that we call dbuf_unoverride() to convert the dirty record into normal write, we should give it the data buffer from dbuf and release one. Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15654 Closes openzfs#15656
Block cloning normally creates dirty record without dr_data. But if the block is read after cloning, it is moved into DB_CACHED state and receives the data buffer. If after that we call dbuf_unoverride() to convert the dirty record into normal write, we should give it the data buffer from dbuf and release one. Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15654 Closes openzfs#15656
Block cloning normally creates dirty record without dr_data. But if the block is read after cloning, it is moved into DB_CACHED state and receives the data buffer. If after that we call dbuf_unoverride() to convert the dirty record into normal write, we should give it the data buffer from dbuf and release one. Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15654 Closes openzfs#15656
Block cloning normally creates dirty record without dr_data. But if the block is read after cloning, it is moved into DB_CACHED state and receives the data buffer. If after that we call dbuf_unoverride() to convert the dirty record into normal write, we should give it the data buffer from dbuf and release one. Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15654 Closes openzfs#15656
Block cloning normally creates dirty record without dr_data. But if the block is read after cloning, it is moved into DB_CACHED state and receives the data buffer. If after that we call dbuf_unoverride() to convert the dirty record into normal write, we should give it the data buffer from dbuf and release one. Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15654 Closes openzfs#15656
Block cloning normally creates dirty record without dr_data. But if the block is read after cloning, it is moved into DB_CACHED state and receives the data buffer. If after that we call dbuf_unoverride() to convert the dirty record into normal write, we should give it the data buffer from dbuf and release one. Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15654 Closes openzfs#15656
Block cloning normally creates dirty record without dr_data. But if the block is read after cloning, it is moved into DB_CACHED state and receives the data buffer. If after that we call dbuf_unoverride() to convert the dirty record into normal write, we should give it the data buffer from dbuf and release one. Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15654 Closes openzfs#15656
Block cloning normally creates dirty record without dr_data. But if the block is read after cloning, it is moved into DB_CACHED state and receives the data buffer. If after that we call dbuf_unoverride() to convert the dirty record into normal write, we should give it the data buffer from dbuf and release one. Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes #15654 Closes #15656
Block cloning normally creates dirty record without dr_data. But if the block is read after cloning, it is moved into DB_CACHED state and receives the data buffer. If after that we call dbuf_unoverride() to convert the dirty record into normal write, we should give it the data buffer from dbuf and release one. Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15654 Closes openzfs#15656
Block cloning normally creates dirty record without dr_data. But if the block is read after cloning, it is moved into DB_CACHED state and receives the data buffer. If after that we call dbuf_unoverride() to convert the dirty record into normal write, we should give it the data buffer from dbuf and release one. Reviewed-by: Kay Pedersen <mail@mkwg.de> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15654 Closes openzfs#15656
System information
Describe the problem you're observing
Test program: https://gist.github.com/robn/9804c60cd0275086d26893d73e7af35c
Sequence is:
Typical stack trace:
I'm not sure if this is another case where the asserts haven't been updated to match the new state transitions, or if there's a real problem.
Also not sure the
mmap
is really involved, but maybe it affects refcounts.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: