Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update cache file when setting compatibility property #12276

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2021

Conversation

behlendorf
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation and Context

Issue #12261 observed the compatibility does not persist when
importing the pool using a cache file.

Description

Unlike most other properties the 'compatibility' property is stored
in the pool config object and not the DMU_OT_POOL_PROPS object.

This had the advantage that the compatibility information is available
without needing to fully import the pool (it can be read with zdb).
However, this means we need to make sure to update both the copy of
the config in the MOS and the cache file. This wasn't being done.

This commit adds a call to spa_async_request() to ensure the copy of
the config in the cache file gets updated as well as the one stored
in the pool. This same change is made for the 'comment' property
which suffers from the same inconsistency.

How Has This Been Tested?

Added a new zpool_create_features_009_pos.ksh test case which
verifies the property is stored where it should be and is correctly
set when importing from a cache file.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

Unlike most other properties the 'compatibility' property is stored
in the pool config object and not the DMU_OT_POOL_PROPS object.

This had the advantage that the compatibility information is available
without needing to fully import the pool (it can be read with zdb).
However, this means we need to make sure to update both the copy of
the config in the MOS and the cache file.  This wasn't being done.

This commit adds a call to spa_async_request() to ensure the copy of
the config in the cache file gets updated as well as the one stored
in the pool.  This same change is made for the 'comment' property
which suffers from the same inconsistency.

Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
module/zfs/spa.c Show resolved Hide resolved
@behlendorf behlendorf added Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) and removed Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing labels Jun 24, 2021
@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit 88a4833 into openzfs:master Jun 24, 2021
behlendorf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2021
Unlike most other properties the 'compatibility' property is stored
in the pool config object and not the DMU_OT_POOL_PROPS object.

This had the advantage that the compatibility information is available
without needing to fully import the pool (it can be read with zdb).
However, this means we need to make sure to update both the copy of
the config in the MOS and the cache file.  This wasn't being done.

This commit adds a call to spa_async_request() to ensure the copy of
the config in the cache file gets updated as well as the one stored
in the pool.  This same change is made for the 'comment' property
which suffers from the same inconsistency.

Reviewed-by: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Colm Buckley <colm@tuatha.org>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes #12261 
Closes #12276
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants