-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
linux/spl: safe cleanup in spl_proc_fini() #15234
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If we fail to create a proc entry in spl_proc_init() we may end up calling unregister_sysctl_table() twice: one in the failure path of spl_proc_init() and another time during spl_proc_fini(). Avoid the double call to unregister_sysctl_table() and while at it refactor the code a bit to reduce code duplication. Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
ixhamza
approved these changes
Sep 1, 2023
behlendorf
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2023
stgraber
pushed a commit
to zabbly/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2023
If we fail to create a proc entry in spl_proc_init() we may end up calling unregister_sysctl_table() twice: one in the failure path of spl_proc_init() and another time during spl_proc_fini(). Avoid the double call to unregister_sysctl_table() and while at it refactor the code a bit to reduce code duplication. This was accidentally introduced when the spl code was updated for Linux 6.5 compatibility. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Ameer Hamza <ahamza@ixsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> Closes openzfs#15234 Closes openzfs#15235
stgraber
pushed a commit
to zabbly/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2023
If we fail to create a proc entry in spl_proc_init() we may end up calling unregister_sysctl_table() twice: one in the failure path of spl_proc_init() and another time during spl_proc_fini(). Avoid the double call to unregister_sysctl_table() and while at it refactor the code a bit to reduce code duplication. This was accidentally introduced when the spl code was updated for Linux 6.5 compatibility. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Ameer Hamza <ahamza@ixsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> Closes openzfs#15234 Closes openzfs#15235
behlendorf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2023
If we fail to create a proc entry in spl_proc_init() we may end up calling unregister_sysctl_table() twice: one in the failure path of spl_proc_init() and another time during spl_proc_fini(). Avoid the double call to unregister_sysctl_table() and while at it refactor the code a bit to reduce code duplication. This was accidentally introduced when the spl code was updated for Linux 6.5 compatibility. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Ameer Hamza <ahamza@ixsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> Closes #15234 Closes #15235
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2023
If we fail to create a proc entry in spl_proc_init() we may end up calling unregister_sysctl_table() twice: one in the failure path of spl_proc_init() and another time during spl_proc_fini(). Avoid the double call to unregister_sysctl_table() and while at it refactor the code a bit to reduce code duplication. This was accidentally introduced when the spl code was updated for Linux 6.5 compatibility. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Ameer Hamza <ahamza@ixsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> Closes #15234 Closes #15235
lundman
pushed a commit
to openzfsonwindows/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2023
If we fail to create a proc entry in spl_proc_init() we may end up calling unregister_sysctl_table() twice: one in the failure path of spl_proc_init() and another time during spl_proc_fini(). Avoid the double call to unregister_sysctl_table() and while at it refactor the code a bit to reduce code duplication. This was accidentally introduced when the spl code was updated for Linux 6.5 compatibility. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Reviewed-by: Ameer Hamza <ahamza@ixsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> Closes openzfs#15234 Closes openzfs#15235
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation and Context
Fix a potential double call to unregister_sysctl_table() in spl.
Description
If we fail to create a proc entry in spl_proc_init() we may end up calling unregister_sysctl_table() twice: one in the failure path of spl_proc_init() and another time during spl_proc_fini().
Avoid the double call to unregister_sysctl_table() and while at it refactor the code a bit to reduce code duplication.
How Has This Been Tested?
This change has been tested recompiling and loading/unloading spl.ko and zfs.ko.
The test has been performed in a local VM: Ubuntu Mantic (23.10) with a 6.5 kernel.
Types of changes
Checklist:
Signed-off-by
.