Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ZIL: Detect single-threaded workloads #15381

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

amotin
Copy link
Member

@amotin amotin commented Oct 10, 2023

... by checking that previous block is fully written and flushed. It allows to skip commit delays since we can give up on aggregation in that case. This removes zil_min_commit_timeout parameter, since for single-threaded workloads it is not needed at all, while on very fast devices even some multi-threaded workloads may get detected as single-threaded and still bypass the wait. To give multi-threaded workloads more aggregation chances increase zfs_commit_timeout_pct from 5 to 10%, as they should suffer less from additional latency.

Also single-threaded workloads detection allows in perspective better prediction of the next block size.

This is another part of #14909.

This partially reverts #14418.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

@amotin amotin added the Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing label Oct 10, 2023
... by checking that previous block is fully written and flushed.
It allows to skip commit delays since we can give up on aggregation
in that case.  This removes zil_min_commit_timeout parameter, since
for single-threaded workloads it is not needed at all, while on very
fast devices even some multi-threaded workloads may get detected as
single-threaded and still bypass the wait.  To give multi-threaded
workloads more aggregation chances increase zfs_commit_timeout_pct
from 5 to 10%, as they should suffer less from additional latency.

Also single-threaded workloads detection allows in perspective better
prediction of the next block size.

Signed-off-by:	Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
@prakashsurya
Copy link
Member

prakashsurya commented Oct 23, 2023

This looks reasonable to me.. I'm running this through our test suite before approving (delphix-internal links here: performance and functional)

@behlendorf behlendorf added Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) and removed Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing labels Oct 24, 2023
@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit 252f46b into openzfs:master Oct 24, 2023
19 checks passed
@amotin amotin added the Type: Performance Performance improvement or performance problem label Oct 25, 2023
lundman pushed a commit to openzfsonwindows/openzfs that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2023
... by checking that previous block is fully written and flushed.
It allows to skip commit delays since we can give up on aggregation
in that case.  This removes zil_min_commit_timeout parameter, since
for single-threaded workloads it is not needed at all, while on very
fast devices even some multi-threaded workloads may get detected as
single-threaded and still bypass the wait.  To give multi-threaded
workloads more aggregation chances increase zfs_commit_timeout_pct
from 5 to 10%, as they should suffer less from additional latency.

Also single-threaded workloads detection allows in perspective better
prediction of the next block size.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by:	Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
Closes openzfs#15381
ixhamza pushed a commit to truenas/zfs that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2024
... by checking that previous block is fully written and flushed.
It allows to skip commit delays since we can give up on aggregation
in that case.  This removes zil_min_commit_timeout parameter, since
for single-threaded workloads it is not needed at all, while on very
fast devices even some multi-threaded workloads may get detected as
single-threaded and still bypass the wait.  To give multi-threaded
workloads more aggregation chances increase zfs_commit_timeout_pct
from 5 to 10%, as they should suffer less from additional latency.

Also single-threaded workloads detection allows in perspective better
prediction of the next block size.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by:	Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
Closes openzfs#15381
ixhamza pushed a commit to truenas/zfs that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
... by checking that previous block is fully written and flushed.
It allows to skip commit delays since we can give up on aggregation
in that case.  This removes zil_min_commit_timeout parameter, since
for single-threaded workloads it is not needed at all, while on very
fast devices even some multi-threaded workloads may get detected as
single-threaded and still bypass the wait.  To give multi-threaded
workloads more aggregation chances increase zfs_commit_timeout_pct
from 5 to 10%, as they should suffer less from additional latency.

Also single-threaded workloads detection allows in perspective better
prediction of the next block size.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by:	Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
Closes openzfs#15381
@amotin amotin deleted the zl_parallel branch March 22, 2024 17:03
amotin added a commit to amotin/zfs that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2024
... by checking that previous block is fully written and flushed.
It allows to skip commit delays since we can give up on aggregation
in that case.  This removes zil_min_commit_timeout parameter, since
for single-threaded workloads it is not needed at all, while on very
fast devices even some multi-threaded workloads may get detected as
single-threaded and still bypass the wait.  To give multi-threaded
workloads more aggregation chances increase zfs_commit_timeout_pct
from 5 to 10%, as they should suffer less from additional latency.

Also single-threaded workloads detection allows in perspective better
prediction of the next block size.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by:	Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
Closes openzfs#15381
behlendorf pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
... by checking that previous block is fully written and flushed.
It allows to skip commit delays since we can give up on aggregation
in that case.  This removes zil_min_commit_timeout parameter, since
for single-threaded workloads it is not needed at all, while on very
fast devices even some multi-threaded workloads may get detected as
single-threaded and still bypass the wait.  To give multi-threaded
workloads more aggregation chances increase zfs_commit_timeout_pct
from 5 to 10%, as they should suffer less from additional latency.

Also single-threaded workloads detection allows in perspective better
prediction of the next block size.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Signed-off-by:	Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Sponsored by:	iXsystems, Inc.
Closes #15381
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) Type: Performance Performance improvement or performance problem
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants