Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix /proc/spl/kstat/simd on x86 #16556

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rincebrain
Copy link
Contributor

Evidently while reworking it on aarch64, I broke it on x86 and didn't notice.

Oops.

Motivation and Context

^

Description

__x86__ is not the correct define.

How Has This Been Tested?

Loading on an x86_64 box.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

Evidently while reworking it on aarch64, I broke it on x86 and
didn't notice.

Signed-off-by: Rich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com>
@behlendorf behlendorf added the Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing label Sep 22, 2024
@behlendorf behlendorf added Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) and removed Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing labels Sep 22, 2024
@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit 1d84c9e into openzfs:master Sep 22, 2024
9 of 20 checks passed
ptr1337 pushed a commit to CachyOS/zfs that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
Evidently while reworking it on aarch64, I broke it on x86 and
didn't notice.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Rich Ercolani <rincebrain@gmail.com>
Closes openzfs#16556
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants