Fix: Array bounds read in zprop_print_one_property() #5003
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If the loop index i comes to (ZFS_GET_NCOLS - 1), the cbp->cb_columns[i + 1] actually read the data of cbp->cb_colwidths[0], which means the array subscript is above array bounds. Luckily the cbp->cb_colwidths[0] is always 0 and it seems we haven't looped enough times to exceed the array bounds so far, but it's really a secluded risk someday.
|
Nice find, LGTM. |
nedbass
pushed a commit
to nedbass/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2016
If the loop index i comes to (ZFS_GET_NCOLS - 1), the cbp->cb_columns[i + 1] actually read the data of cbp->cb_colwidths[0], which means the array subscript is above array bounds. Luckily the cbp->cb_colwidths[0] is always 0 and it seems we haven't looped enough times to exceed the array bounds so far, but it's really a secluded risk someday. Signed-off-by: GeLiXin <ge.lixin@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes openzfs#5003
nedbass
pushed a commit
to nedbass/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2016
If the loop index i comes to (ZFS_GET_NCOLS - 1), the cbp->cb_columns[i + 1] actually read the data of cbp->cb_colwidths[0], which means the array subscript is above array bounds. Luckily the cbp->cb_colwidths[0] is always 0 and it seems we haven't looped enough times to exceed the array bounds so far, but it's really a secluded risk someday. Signed-off-by: GeLiXin <ge.lixin@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes openzfs#5003
nedbass
pushed a commit
to nedbass/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2016
If the loop index i comes to (ZFS_GET_NCOLS - 1), the cbp->cb_columns[i + 1] actually read the data of cbp->cb_colwidths[0], which means the array subscript is above array bounds. Luckily the cbp->cb_colwidths[0] is always 0 and it seems we haven't looped enough times to exceed the array bounds so far, but it's really a secluded risk someday. Signed-off-by: GeLiXin <ge.lixin@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes openzfs#5003
tuxoko
pushed a commit
to tuxoko/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2016
If the loop index i comes to (ZFS_GET_NCOLS - 1), the cbp->cb_columns[i + 1] actually read the data of cbp->cb_colwidths[0], which means the array subscript is above array bounds. Luckily the cbp->cb_colwidths[0] is always 0 and it seems we haven't looped enough times to exceed the array bounds so far, but it's really a secluded risk someday. Signed-off-by: GeLiXin <ge.lixin@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes openzfs#5003
nedbass
pushed a commit
to nedbass/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2016
If the loop index i comes to (ZFS_GET_NCOLS - 1), the cbp->cb_columns[i + 1] actually read the data of cbp->cb_colwidths[0], which means the array subscript is above array bounds. Luckily the cbp->cb_colwidths[0] is always 0 and it seems we haven't looped enough times to exceed the array bounds so far, but it's really a secluded risk someday. Signed-off-by: GeLiXin <ge.lixin@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes openzfs#5003
nedbass
pushed a commit
to nedbass/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2016
If the loop index i comes to (ZFS_GET_NCOLS - 1), the cbp->cb_columns[i + 1] actually read the data of cbp->cb_colwidths[0], which means the array subscript is above array bounds. Luckily the cbp->cb_colwidths[0] is always 0 and it seems we haven't looped enough times to exceed the array bounds so far, but it's really a secluded risk someday. Signed-off-by: GeLiXin <ge.lixin@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes openzfs#5003
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If the loop index
icomes to(ZFS_GET_NCOLS - 1), thecbp->cb_columns[i + 1]actuallyread the data of
cbp->cb_colwidths[0], which means the array subscript is above array bounds.Luckily the
cbp->cb_colwidths[0]is always 0(GET_COL_NONE)now, and it seems we haven't looped enough times to exceed the array bounds so far, but it's really a secluded risk someday.