-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix atomic_sub_64() i386 assembly implementation #5717
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@behlendorf, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @dechamps to be a potential reviewer. |
The atomic_sub_64() should use sbbl instead of adcl. In user space these atomics are used for statistics tracking and aren't critical which explain how this was overlooked. The kernel space implementation of these atomics are layered on the architecture specific implementations provided by the kernel. Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Issue openzfs#5671
@Ringdingcoder can you please review the simple fix for the issue your pointed out in #5671. |
Ringdingcoder
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2017
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good to me.
wli5
pushed a commit
to wli5/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2017
The atomic_sub_64() should use sbbl instead of adcl. In user space these atomics are used for statistics tracking and aren't critical which explain how this was overlooked. The kernel space implementation of these atomics are layered on the architecture specific implementations provided by the kernel. Reviewed by: Stefan Ring <stefanrin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes openzfs#5671 Closes openzfs#5717
wli5
pushed a commit
to wli5/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2017
The atomic_sub_64() should use sbbl instead of adcl. In user space these atomics are used for statistics tracking and aren't critical which explain how this was overlooked. The kernel space implementation of these atomics are layered on the architecture specific implementations provided by the kernel. Reviewed by: Stefan Ring <stefanrin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes openzfs#5671 Closes openzfs#5717
l1k
pushed a commit
to l1k/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2017
The atomic_sub_64() should use sbbl instead of adcl. In user space these atomics are used for statistics tracking and aren't critical which explain how this was overlooked. The kernel space implementation of these atomics are layered on the architecture specific implementations provided by the kernel. Reviewed by: Stefan Ring <stefanrin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes openzfs#5671 Closes openzfs#5717
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
to tonyhutter/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2017
The atomic_sub_64() should use sbbl instead of adcl. In user space these atomics are used for statistics tracking and aren't critical which explain how this was overlooked. The kernel space implementation of these atomics are layered on the architecture specific implementations provided by the kernel. Reviewed by: Stefan Ring <stefanrin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes openzfs#5671 Closes openzfs#5717
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2017
The atomic_sub_64() should use sbbl instead of adcl. In user space these atomics are used for statistics tracking and aren't critical which explain how this was overlooked. The kernel space implementation of these atomics are layered on the architecture specific implementations provided by the kernel. Reviewed by: Stefan Ring <stefanrin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #5671 Closes #5717
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The atomic_sub_64() should use sbbl instead of adcl. In user
space these atomics are used for statistics tracking and aren't
critical which explain how this was overlooked. The kernel
space implementation of these atomics are layered on the
architecture specific implementations provided by the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf behlendorf1@llnl.gov
Issue #5671