Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix dirty check in dmu_offset_next() #6867

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2017

Conversation

behlendorf
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The correct way to determine if a dnode is dirty is to check
if any of the dn->dn_dirty_link's are active. Relying solely
on the dn->dn_dirtyctx can result in the dnode being mistakenly
reported as clean.

Motivation and Context

Issue #3125

How Has This Been Tested?

Many helpful Gentoo users who encountered this issue specifically when running emerge.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the ZFS on Linux code style requirements.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • All commit messages are properly formatted and contain Signed-off-by.
  • Change has been approved by a ZFS on Linux member.

The correct way to determine if a dnode is dirty is to check
if any of the dn->dn_dirty_link's are active.  Relying solely
on the dn->dn_dirtyctx can result in the dnode being mistakenly
reported as clean.

Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue openzfs#3125
@behlendorf behlendorf requested a review from tuxoko November 15, 2017 15:05
@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit 454365b into openzfs:master Nov 15, 2017
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2017
The correct way to determine if a dnode is dirty is to check
if any of the dn->dn_dirty_link's are active.  Relying solely
on the dn->dn_dirtyctx can result in the dnode being mistakenly
reported as clean.

Reviewed-by: Chunwei Chen <tuxoko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes openzfs#3125
Closes openzfs#6867

Requires-spl: refs/pull/669/head
tonyhutter pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2017
The correct way to determine if a dnode is dirty is to check
if any of the dn->dn_dirty_link's are active.  Relying solely
on the dn->dn_dirtyctx can result in the dnode being mistakenly
reported as clean.

Reviewed-by: Chunwei Chen <tuxoko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes #3125 
Closes #6867
Nasf-Fan pushed a commit to Nasf-Fan/zfs that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2018
The correct way to determine if a dnode is dirty is to check
if any of the dn->dn_dirty_link's are active.  Relying solely
on the dn->dn_dirtyctx can result in the dnode being mistakenly
reported as clean.

Reviewed-by: Chunwei Chen <tuxoko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes openzfs#3125
Closes openzfs#6867
Nasf-Fan pushed a commit to Nasf-Fan/zfs that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2018
The correct way to determine if a dnode is dirty is to check
if any of the dn->dn_dirty_link's are active.  Relying solely
on the dn->dn_dirtyctx can result in the dnode being mistakenly
reported as clean.

Reviewed-by: Chunwei Chen <tuxoko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <mail@gmelikov.ru>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes openzfs#3125
Closes openzfs#6867
@behlendorf behlendorf deleted the issue-3125 branch April 19, 2021 19:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants