Refresch a bit the 'packages' CI/CD with latest version of actions/distrib

[kelson42]

• Refresh a bit the configuration
• Add ubuntu-moble to CI/CD
• Add the latest Debian to the CI
• Remove old zimwriter deb package

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 27.01%. Comparing base (fab5063) to head (304c458).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #424   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   27.01%   27.01%           
=======================================
  Files          26       26           
  Lines        2458     2458           
  Branches     1339     1339           
=======================================
  Hits          664      664           
  Misses       1305     1305           
  Partials      489      489           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[kelson42]

Maybe @tusharpm you can have a look to that PR and you have a few feedbacks?

[kelson42]

@tusharpm Do you know why we have this error on Ubuntu packages? For Debian, I guess it fails because - like you said - packages are not updated upstream in Debian repositories (ping @legoktm)

[kelson42]

@tusharpm So, finally it seems the zim-tools.install file was really not necessary. I have removed it and now the Ubuntu deb files seem OK. But the Debian deb file still fail to build because libzim 9.2 has not been upload or not available at all. @legoktm or @tusharpm Are you able to help with this last problem?

[tusharpm]

@tusharpm So, finally it seems the zim-tools.install file was really not necessary. I have removed it and now the Ubuntu deb files seem OK.

Nice catch! I don't know whether this impacts the output deb file in any way. I'll try spinning up a docker container and test them from the launchpad PPA.

But the Debian deb file still fail to build because libzim 9.2 has not been upload or not available at all. @legoktm or @tusharpm Are you able to help with this last problem?

Sadly, I'm not a Debian package maintainer. I'll defer to @legoktm for comment on updating the Debian pacakages.

Meanwhile, I suggest to continue using the previous (available) version of libzim if it doesn't have a major drawback/security vulnerability.

[kelson42]

But the Debian deb file still fail to build because libzim 9.2 has not been upload or not available at all. @legoktm or @tusharpm Are you able to help with this last problem?

Sadly, I'm not a Debian package maintainer. I'll defer to @legoktm for comment on updating the Debian pacakages.

Meanwhile, I suggest to continue using the previous (available) version of libzim if it doesn't have a major drawback/security vulnerability.

This version of libzim relies on libzim 9.2, there is nothing I believe I can do about that. For the rest I kind of believe that @legoktm would be kind of consider to have a deputy, so don't be shy and ask him if you want and believe you have enough skills. For Kiwix this would be great, because it is not rare that @legoktm lack of time.