Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Upgrade to browsertrix crawler 1.4.2, fix integration tests and fix docker label #450

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025
Merged

Upgrade to browsertrix crawler 1.4.2, fix integration tests and fix docker label #450

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

benoit74
Copy link
Collaborator

@benoit74 benoit74 commented Jan 9, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Changes:

  • Upgrade to browsertrix crawler 1.4.2
  • Move integrations tests to official test website instead of (defunct) personal test website
  • Fix Docker label to follow new convention

@benoit74 benoit74 self-assigned this Jan 9, 2025
@benoit74 benoit74 added this to the 2.2.0 milestone Jan 9, 2025
@benoit74 benoit74 requested a review from rgaudin January 9, 2025 10:45
@benoit74 benoit74 changed the title Upgrade to browsertrix crawler 1.4.2 Upgrade to browsertrix crawler 1.4.2, fix integration tests and fix docker label Jan 9, 2025
@benoit74 benoit74 modified the milestones: 2.2.0, 2.1.7 Jan 9, 2025
rgaudin
rgaudin approved these changes Jan 9, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@rgaudin rgaudin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you

@benoit74 benoit74 merged commit 8cddcf0 into main Jan 9, 2025
5 checks passed
@benoit74 benoit74 deleted the upgrade_crawler branch January 9, 2025 12:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@rgaudin rgaudin rgaudin approved these changes

Assignees

@benoit74 benoit74

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.1.7
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@benoit74 @rgaudin