-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-17157: operators/v1alpha1: expose CSV copied logic #289
OCPBUGS-17157: operators/v1alpha1: expose CSV copied logic #289
Conversation
04edc4f
to
7b4d617
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #289 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 41.94% 42.16% +0.22%
==========================================
Files 39 39
Lines 3488 3491 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 1463 1472 +9
+ Misses 1879 1873 -6
Partials 146 146
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval. This pull-request has been approved by: stevekuznetsov The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
We want to use a partial object metadata query for CSVs to reduce resource utilization. We still want to ask questions about whether these CSVs are copied, so we need to refactor this method to take only object metadata. While it's not a perfect port of the previous logic, it defies explanation how an object would have all the other markings of being copied but the wrong status. Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
7b4d617
to
0e9374d
Compare
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
Going to self-tag since all I did was add a unit test to appease the coverage gods |
409ec70
into
operator-framework:master
I post-merge lgtm XD |
We want to use a partial object metadata query for CSVs to reduce resource utilization. We still want to ask questions about whether these CSVs are copied, so we need to refactor this method to take only object metadata. While it's not a perfect port of the previous logic, it defies explanation how an object would have all the other markings of being copied but the wrong status.