Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 30, 2021. It is now read-only.

Update eclipse-che operator for kubernetes to release 7.25.0 #3059

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2021
Merged

Update eclipse-che operator for kubernetes to release 7.25.0 #3059

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2021

Conversation

mkuznyetsov
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Mykhailo Kuznietsov mkuznets@redhat.com

Updates to existing Operators

  • Did you create a ci.yaml file according to the update instructions?
  • Is your new CSV pointing to the previous version with the replaces property if you chose replaces-mode via the updateGraph property in ci.yaml?
  • Is your new CSV referenced in the appropriate channel defined in the package.yaml or annotations.yaml ?
  • Have you tested an update to your Operator when deployed via OLM?
  • Is your submission signed?

Your submission should not

  • Modify more than one operator
  • Modify an Operator you don't own
  • Rename an operator - please remove and add with a different name instead
  • Submit operators to both upstream-community-operators and community-operators at once
  • Modify any files outside the above mentioned folders
  • Contain more than one commit. Please squash your commits.

Operator Description must contain (in order)

  1. Description about the managed Application and where to find more information
  2. Features and capabilities of your Operator and how to use it
  3. Any manual steps about potential pre-requisites for using your Operator

Operator Metadata should contain

  • Human readable name and 1-liner description about your Operator
  • Valid category name1
  • One of the pre-defined capability levels2
  • Links to the maintainer, source code and documentation
  • Example templates for all Custom Resource Definitions intended to be used
  • A quadratic logo

Remember that you can preview your CSV here.

--

1 If you feel your Operator does not fit any of the pre-defined categories, file an issue against this repo and explain your need

2 For more information see here

Signed-off-by: Mykhailo Kuznietsov <mkuznets@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added kubernetes-operator An Operator targeting OperatorHub.io needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 27, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @mkuznyetsov. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a operator-framework member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@J0zi J0zi removed the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jan 29, 2021
@nickboldt nickboldt mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2021
16 tasks
@mvalarh mvalarh self-assigned this Feb 1, 2021
@mvalarh mvalarh marked this pull request as draft February 1, 2021 09:30
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 1, 2021
@mvalarh mvalarh marked this pull request as ready for review February 1, 2021 09:31
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 1, 2021
@mvalarh mvalarh merged commit 6b44159 into operator-framework:master Feb 1, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
kubernetes-operator An Operator targeting OperatorHub.io
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants