-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 223
Monitoring improvements #616
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
235169c
refactor: fix generics
metacosm 40c21b2
fix: restore thread's original name
metacosm 93b7fa5
refactor: move Metrics to api.monitoring package
metacosm 35b9309
refactor: move MicrometerMetrics to monitoring package
metacosm e371a85
refactor: extract EventMonitor to api.monitoring package
metacosm e01ccfc
refactor: remove deprecated static monitor field
metacosm 43ffc86
chore: remove obsolete class
metacosm 96db123
refactor: add Type on Event
metacosm 0c30922
refactor: add triggering Event on ExecutionScope and propagate it
metacosm 24d0902
refactor: simplify EvenMonitor methods
metacosm 045ae10
refactor: remove EventMonitor altogether and improve counter reporting
metacosm ec137dc
fix: more generics fixes
metacosm df6f664
fix: minor clean-ups
metacosm File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
22 changes: 0 additions & 22 deletions
22
operator-framework-core/src/main/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/EventListUtils.java
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this really what we should measure? Isn't that the number of reconciliations in this case actually. Since we tried to move away from events.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it measures the number of reconciliation requests. The thinking was that it might be interesting to see how many reconciliation requests happened vs. the number of reconciliations that actually went through (
processedEvent
).Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't we rename the method accordingly? Like
reconcilingStarted
,reconcilingFinished
,reconcilingFailed
?