Skip to content

Conversation

tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort commented Jun 12, 2025

Check-in manifests to the manifests directory.
Currently, there is:

  • "standard" manifests, which is used as the basis for e2e and quickstart
  • "cluster-catalogs" manifests, which is just moved from the config dir

This is a quick/simple start to some of the Feature-Gated API work.

Description

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@tmshort tmshort requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2025 18:46
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Jun 12, 2025

/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 12, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit bdcbd4d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/684b3685bf2df300085210f3
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2025--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Makefile Outdated
# Generate the remaining catalogd manifests
$(CONTROLLER_GEN) --load-build-tags=$(GO_BUILD_TAGS) rbac:roleName=manager-role paths="./internal/catalogd/..." output:rbac:artifacts:config=$(KUSTOMIZE_CATD_RBAC_DIR)
$(CONTROLLER_GEN) --load-build-tags=$(GO_BUILD_TAGS) webhook paths="./internal/catalogd/..." output:webhook:artifacts:config=$(KUSTOMIZE_CATD_WEBHOOKS_DIR)
# Generate the checked-in manifests
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: the use of the phrase "checked-in" here and in other places is most likely going to be a source of confusion for future maintainers. Maybe

Generate manifests to be committed to version control or Generate and store manifests in the manifests directory, for distribution ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"checked-in" is a very common term for code that's in source control.

Makefile Outdated
quickstart: $(KUSTOMIZE) manifests #EXHELP Generate the unified installation release manifests and scripts.
$(KUSTOMIZE) build $(KUSTOMIZE_BUILD_DIR) | sed "s/cert-git-version/cert-$(VERSION)/g" | sed "s/:devel/:$(VERSION)/g" > $(RELEASE_MANIFEST)
quickstart: manifests #EXHELP Generate the unified installation release manifests and scripts.
# Update the image version in the standard manifests
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# Update the image version in the standard manifests
# Update the image version in the stored manifests

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The use use of the term "standard" is a reflection of the nature of the manifests as described in the Feature Gated APIs RFC.

Check-in manifests to the manifests directory.
Currently, there is:
* "standard" manifests, which is used as the basis for e2e and quickstart
* "cluster-catalogs" manifests, which is just moved from the config dir

Signed-off-by: Todd Short <tshort@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@anik120 anik120 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 12, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 12, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: anik120, tmshort

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.28%. Comparing base (1a27741) to head (bdcbd4d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2025   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.28%   69.28%           
=======================================
  Files          79       79           
  Lines        7051     7051           
=======================================
  Hits         4885     4885           
  Misses       1884     1884           
  Partials      282      282           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 43.00% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️
unit 60.19% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit b004bc2 into operator-framework:main Jun 12, 2025
22 of 23 checks passed
@tmshort tmshort deleted the new-manifests branch June 12, 2025 23:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants