Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move pkg/k8sutil to internal/k8sutil #3475

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 21, 2020

Conversation

hasbro17
Copy link
Contributor

Description of the change:
Move pkg/k8sutil to internal/k8sutil to remove public APIs for v1.0.0 release

Motivation for the change:
Related to #3327

Remove all public APIs from SDK to prepare for v1.0.0
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing fragment since is a breaking change
Otherwise, it is ok.
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 21, 2020
Copy link
Member

@joelanford joelanford left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 21, 2020
@joelanford
Copy link
Member

Should we combine internal/k8sutil and internal/util/k8sutil?

@hasbro17
Copy link
Contributor Author

@joelanford Good point, I would say yes. I'll move it to internal/util/k8sutil.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@hasbro17 hasbro17 merged commit d3c1728 into operator-framework:master Jul 21, 2020
@hasbro17 hasbro17 deleted the make-k8sutil-internal branch July 21, 2020 17:57
bartoszmajsak added a commit to maistra/istio-workspace that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2020
Introduces our own getWatchNamespace func

See operator-framework/operator-sdk#3475
bartoszmajsak added a commit to maistra/istio-workspace that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2021
Introduces our own getWatchNamespace func

See operator-framework/operator-sdk#3475
aslakknutsen pushed a commit to maistra/istio-workspace that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2021
Introduces our own getWatchNamespace func

See operator-framework/operator-sdk#3475
skitt added a commit to skitt/submariner-operator that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2021
k8sutil is no longer exported by the Operator SDK (see
<operator-framework/operator-sdk#3475>). Instead
of using k8sutil.GetWatchNamespace(), use our own implementation, as
explained on
https://sdk.operatorframework.io/docs/building-operators/golang/operator-scope/#configuring-namespace-scoped-operators

Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <skitt@redhat.com>
skitt added a commit to skitt/submariner-operator that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2021
k8sutil is no longer exported by the Operator SDK (see
<operator-framework/operator-sdk#3475>). Instead
of using k8sutil.GetWatchNamespace(), use our own implementation, as
explained on
https://sdk.operatorframework.io/docs/building-operators/golang/operator-scope/#configuring-namespace-scoped-operators

Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <skitt@redhat.com>
dfarrell07 pushed a commit to submariner-io/submariner-operator that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2021
k8sutil is no longer exported by the Operator SDK (see
<operator-framework/operator-sdk#3475>). Instead
of using k8sutil.GetWatchNamespace(), use our own implementation, as
explained on
https://sdk.operatorframework.io/docs/building-operators/golang/operator-scope/#configuring-namespace-scoped-operators

Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <skitt@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants