This repo is for review of requests for signing shim. To create a request for review:
- clone this repo
- edit the template below
- add the shim.efi to be signed
- add build logs
- add any additional binaries/certificates/SHA256 hashes that may be needed
- commit all of that
- tag it with a tag of the form "myorg-shim-arch-YYYYMMDD"
- push that to github
- file an issue at https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review/issues with a link to your tag
- approval is ready when the "accepted" label is added to your issue
Note that we really only have experience with using GRUB2 on Linux, so asking us to endorse anything else for signing is going to require some convincing on your part.
Check the docs directory in this repo for guidance on submission and getting your shim signed.
Here's the template:
uib gmbh - we are the developers of opsi. uib gmbh Bonifaziusplatz 1b 55118 Mainz https://www.uib.de
opsi is an open source operating system provisioning and software deployment framework. We want to deploy Windows with support for SecureBoot and therefore request a signing of our SHIM. This SHIM contains ourt company key. With this key we will sign the following data and enable an easy to use way to deploy SecureBoot via opsi.
What's the justification that this really does need to be signed for the whole world to be able to boot it?
opsi is used to deploy operating systems on a large amount of devices. It would be a disadvantage to manually deploy a key on all SecureBoot enabled machines, especially when a customer has a couple hundreds or even more than throusand machines. Therefore we request a signed SHIM to further sign the rets of our deployment with our key, which is included in the shim, to ease the deployment process.
We are using a self compiled Linux Kernel and Miniroot. To boot with secure boot enabled, shim needs to know the certificate of the CA used to sign the kernel image.
The security contacts need to be verified before the shim can be accepted. For subsequent requests, contact verification is only necessary if the security contacts or their PGP keys have changed since the last successful verification.
An authorized reviewer will initiate contact verification by sending each security contact a PGP-encrypted email containing random words.
You will be asked to post the contents of these mails in your shim-review
issue to prove ownership of the email addresses and PGP keys.
- Name: Erol ĂślĂĽkmen
- Position: CEO
- Email address: e.ueluekmen@uib.de
- PGP key fingerprint: 9083B7BB221D5E6578E3450D06DA6B5DFD200AAE
- PGP key id: 0x06DA6B5DFD200AAE
(Key should be signed by the other security contacts, pushed to a keyserver like keyserver.ubuntu.com, and preferably have signatures that are reasonably well known in the Linux community.)
- Name: Mathias Radtke
- Position: Developer
- Email address: m.radtke@uib.de
- PGP key fingerprint: D905656EDA12972F39FD9EB64719E3A9F93C6B3C
- PGP key id: 0x4719E3A9F93C6B3C
(Key should be signed by the other security contacts, pushed to a keyserver like keyserver.ubuntu.com, and preferably have signatures that are reasonably well known in the Linux community.)
Please create your shim binaries starting with the 15.8 shim release tar file: https://github.com/rhboot/shim/releases/download/15.7/shim-15.8.tar.bz2
This matches https://github.com/rhboot/shim/releases/tag/15.8 and contains the appropriate gnu-efi source.
We can confirm that all of our shim binaries are built from the referenced tarball.
https://github.com/opsi-org/shim-review
dell_netboot_fix.patch has been added to fix a bug appearing on some Dell devices. The issue leads to non booting devices via TFTP. More on this issue can be read here: rhboot/shim#649
If shim is loading GRUB2 bootloader what exact implementation of Secureboot in GRUB2 do you have? (Either Upstream GRUB2 shim_lock verifier or Downstream RHEL/Fedora/Debian/Canonical-like implementation)
Upstream GRUB2 shim_lock verifier
If shim is loading GRUB2 bootloader and your previously released shim booted a version of GRUB2 affected by any of the CVEs in the July 2020, the March 2021, the June 7th 2022, the November 15th 2022, or 3rd of October 2023 GRUB2 CVE list, have fixes for all these CVEs been applied?
- 2020 July - BootHole
- Details: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2020-07/msg00034.html
- CVE-2020-10713
- CVE-2020-14308
- CVE-2020-14309
- CVE-2020-14310
- CVE-2020-14311
- CVE-2020-15705
- CVE-2020-15706
- CVE-2020-15707
- March 2021
- Details: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2021-03/msg00007.html
- CVE-2020-14372
- CVE-2020-25632
- CVE-2020-25647
- CVE-2020-27749
- CVE-2020-27779
- CVE-2021-3418 (if you are shipping the shim_lock module)
- CVE-2021-20225
- CVE-2021-20233
- June 2022
- Details: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2022-06/msg00035.html, SBAT increase to 2
- CVE-2021-3695
- CVE-2021-3696
- CVE-2021-3697
- CVE-2022-28733
- CVE-2022-28734
- CVE-2022-28735
- CVE-2022-28736
- CVE-2022-28737
- November 2022
- Details: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2022-11/msg00059.html, SBAT increase to 3
- CVE-2022-2601
- CVE-2022-3775
- October 2023 - NTFS vulnerabilities
- Details: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2023-10/msg00028.html, SBAT increase to 4
- CVE-2023-4693
- CVE-2023-4692
Yes, all fixed for the above CVEs have been applied
If these fixes have been applied, is the upstream global SBAT generation in your GRUB2 binary set to 4?
The entry should look similar to: grub,4,Free Software Foundation,grub,GRUB_UPSTREAM_VERSION,https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/
Yes
Old shim hashes have been provided to microsoft Chain of trust disallows booting old GRUB2 builds affected by mentioned CVEs SBAT Version has been incremented to prevent booting old version Shims
Is upstream commit 1957a85b0032a81e6482ca4aab883643b8dae06e "efi: Restrict efivar_ssdt_load when the kernel is locked down" applied?
Is upstream commit 75b0cea7bf307f362057cc778efe89af4c615354 "ACPI: configfs: Disallow loading ACPI tables when locked down" applied?
Is upstream commit eadb2f47a3ced5c64b23b90fd2a3463f63726066 "lockdown: also lock down previous kgdb use" applied?
All of the above commits are implemented in our linux kernel.
No
If not, please describe how you ensure that one kernel build does not load modules built for another kernel.
Yes
If you use vendor_db functionality of providing multiple certificates and/or hashes please briefly describe your certificate setup.
If there are allow-listed hashes please provide exact binaries for which hashes are created via file sharing service, available in public with anonymous access for verification.
no vendor_db functionality in use
If you are re-using a previously used (CA) certificate, you will need to add the hashes of the previous GRUB2 binaries exposed to the CVEs to vendor_dbx in shim in order to prevent GRUB2 from being able to chainload those older GRUB2 binaries. If you are changing to a new (CA) certificate, this does not apply.
no vendor_db functionality in use as SBAT version has been increased with review #360
What OS and toolchain must we use to reproduce this build? Include where to find it, etc. We're going to try to reproduce your build as closely as possible to verify that it's really a build of the source tree you tell us it is, so these need to be fairly thorough. At the very least include the specific versions of gcc, binutils, and gnu-efi which were used, and where to find those binaries.
If the shim binaries can't be reproduced using the provided Dockerfile, please explain why that's the case and what the differences would be.
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
Release: 22.04
Codename: jammy
ii binutils 2.38-4ubuntu2.6 amd64 GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities
ii gcc 4:11.2.0-1ubuntu1 amd64 GNU C compiler
ii gcc-10-base:amd64 10.5.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection (base package)
ii gcc-11 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GNU C compiler
ii gcc-11-base:amd64 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection (base package)
ii gcc-11-multilib 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GNU C compiler (multilib support)
ii gcc-12-base:amd64 12.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection (base package)
ii gcc-9 9.5.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GNU C compiler
ii gcc-9-base:amd64 9.5.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection (base package)
ii gcc-multilib 4:11.2.0-1ubuntu1 amd64 GNU C compiler (multilib files)
ii lib32gcc-11-dev 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GCC support library (32 bit development files)
ii lib32gcc-s1 12.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GCC support library (32 bit Version)
ii libgcc-11-dev:amd64 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GCC support library (development files)
ii libgcc-9-dev:amd64 9.5.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GCC support library (development files)
ii libgcc-s1:amd64 12.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GCC support library
ii libx32gcc-11-dev 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GCC support library (x32 development files)
ii libx32gcc-s1 12.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 amd64 GCC support library (x32)
ii gnu-efi 3.0.13+git20210716.269ef9d-2ubuntu1 amd64 Library for developing EFI applications
This should include logs for creating the buildroots, applying patches, doing the build, creating the archives, etc.
https://github.com/opsi-org/shim-review/blob/master/build.log
added dell_netboot_fix.patch to fix issue rhboot/shim#649
9c447ae6ee1010eb19645c9479cb47c35eb4afab8b3b36eda586112c1a68c19e
The token we use is a Hardware Token provided by our EV Certificate Issuer (Globalsign). Our signing key for the Secure Boot binaries is stored on this token, next to our EV certificate. The EV certificate itself was used to initially sign the testfile for Microsoft when joining the Microsoft Developers Program for the UEFI submissions and is NOT used to sign Kernel or Grub2 images. The Secure Boot keys are used to sign our Kernel and Grub2 images. Those Secure Boot keys match the embedded CA Cert in our shim submission. This token is only used on this one machine. We run automated build processes for Grub2 binaries and Linux Kernel builds. After the automated build is complete the artifacts are published on an internal only file server. We then download those files on the sign machine, enter the token password and sign the files with the aforementioned Secure Boot keys. Those signed files are then uploaded to the file server again. Afterwards an automated process takes over to create a package with those signed files, along with other files.
No
Do you add a vendor-specific SBAT entry to the SBAT section in each binary that supports SBAT metadata ( GRUB2, fwupd, fwupdate, shim + all child shim binaries )?
Please provide exact SBAT entries for all SBAT binaries you are booting or planning to boot directly through shim.
Where your code is only slightly modified from an upstream vendor's, please also preserve their SBAT entries to simplify revocation.
If you are using a downstream implementation of GRUB2 (e.g. from Fedora or Debian), please preserve the SBAT entry from those distributions and only append your own. More information on how SBAT works can be found here.
shim
sbat,1,SBAT Version,sbat,1,https://github.com/rhboot/shim/blob/main/SBAT.md
shim,4,UEFI shim,shim,1,https://github.com/rhboot/shim
shim.opsi,4,opsi,shim,15.8,https://opsi.org
grub
sbat,1,SBAT Version,sbat,1,https://github.com/rhboot/shim/blob/main/SBAT.md
grub,4,Free Software Foundation,grub,2.12-rc1,https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/
grub.opsi,4,opsi,grub2,2.12,https://opsi.org`
all_video cat chain configfile echo exfat ext2 fat font gfxmenu gfxterm_background gfxterm halt http iso9660 lvm memdisk minicmd msdospart normal ntfs ntfscomp part_apple part_gpt part_msdos password password_pbkdf2 pbkdf2 png read reboot regexp scsi search serial sleep smbios tftp time tar test true video efifwsetup efinet linuxefi biosdisk gzio search_fs_file linux net pxe
It doesn't
If your GRUB2 launches any other binaries that are not the Linux kernel in SecureBoot mode, please provide further details on what is launched and how it enforces Secureboot lockdown.
It doesn't
grub2 verifies signatures on booted kernels via shim.
No, it boots GRUB only.
linux, various versions. Starting with 6.6.X. They include lockdown patches & ACPI patches, lockdown is enforced when booted with SecureBoot, config enforces kernel module signatures under lockdown.
[your text here]