Skip to content

Conversation

@rjeberhard
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@tbarnes-us

This comment has been minimized.

@tbarnes-us tbarnes-us self-requested a review May 28, 2021 14:45
@rjeberhard rjeberhard requested a review from ankedia May 28, 2021 18:30
@rjeberhard
Copy link
Member Author

@tbarnes-us, I've updated the scripts and WLST to as closely as possible match the timestamps that the operator generates. @ankedia, I know you are away today, but next week can you please take a look at this? Tom noted that you may have timing scripts that depend on the format of timestamps.

Copy link
Member

@ankedia ankedia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. As I mentioned, the timing scripts are not actively being used and I can tweak them to match the new format if needed.

@rjeberhard rjeberhard merged commit 6bab4b0 into main Jun 2, 2021
@rjeberhard rjeberhard deleted the owls-89666-consistent-dt-format branch January 31, 2022 14:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants