We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Another typo in obtheory (Q: shall I just put all typos into this issue?):
Lines 33,34: * There are two selector functions, ob.a(z) and ob.b(z) that given any ob and determine an ob as their result.
"given any ob determine an ob ...." -- the "and" does not belong there.
Originally posted by @band in #16 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
obtheory typo, lines 107-111:
Ob5. Totality ob.is-individual(z) ∨ ob.is-enclosure(z) ∨ ob.is-pair(z)
It is a consequence that each ob is exactly one of pair,
enclosure, and individual and there are no others.
Should this read "... one of pair, enclosure, or individual and ..."?
Sorry, something went wrong.
obtheory typo, line 139
In formats having greater typographical flexibility than plaintest, there
"plaintest" should be "plaintext"
0.2.9 obtheory.txt tidying
5f845a6
Apply @band suggestion in issue #19 along with some touch-ups and cross-reference to ob.txt
0.1.7 ob.txt touch-ups
6ac42fc
Provide fixes for @band issue #19 and issue #20, with more on idioms for list structures.
No branches or pull requests
Another typo in obtheory (Q: shall I just put all typos into this issue?):
Lines 33,34:
* There are two selector functions, ob.a(z) and ob.b(z) that given
any ob and determine an ob as their result.
"given any ob determine an ob ...." -- the "and" does not belong there.
Originally posted by @band in #16 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: