Fee-spent but unlost inscriptions

[casey]

@raphjaph This is a truly horrific PR, but I wrote a bunch of tests and tested it from a few angles and I think it works.

This does a few things:

• Tracks inscriptions that are spent to fees
• Tracks inscriptions that are spent to fees that are then underpaid (thus destroying the sat). These have their locations updated to a satpoint consisting of a null outpoint, with an offset which increments as sats are lost
• Tracks rare sats that are spent to fees

[chendatony31]

Hi @casey, do you have a block number example that meets the condition Tracks inscriptions that are spent to fees that are then underpaid (thus destroying the sat). These have their locations updated to a satpoint consisting of a null outpoint, with an offset which increments as sats are lost

[chendatony31]

Is destroying the sat or lost sat mean the coinbase transaction didn't pay all of the fees and reward to the miner?