Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Intent API [moved] #1

Closed
lvca opened this issue Dec 10, 2012 · 0 comments
Closed

New Intent API [moved] #1

lvca opened this issue Dec 10, 2012 · 0 comments

Comments

@lvca
Copy link
Member

lvca commented Dec 10, 2012

This is Issue 1 moved from a Google Code project.
Added by 2010-04-01T19:19:54.000Z by l.garu...@gmail.com.
Please review that bug for more context and additional comments, but update this bug.
Closed (Fixed).

Original labels: Type-Enhancement, Priority-Medium

Original description

It would great having a new API to define the intent. I mean, you can
suggest to the engine what you're going to do. Example:

db.declareIntent( Intent.MASSIVE_INSERT );
db.declareIntent( Intent.NORMAL );

In this way the engine could optimize some behaviour based on the declared
intent.
@lvca lvca closed this as completed Dec 10, 2012
lvca pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2013
update from nuvolabase repo
lvca pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2014
Merge changes from orientechnologies.
lvca pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2014
tglman pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2014
lvca pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2015
Fix Possibly #4202 in distributed mode
luigidellaquila pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2019
merging upstream changes to my fork
tglman pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 10, 2024
update interface.

(there is a failing test,  but it also failed before the PR, and it's not related to this change; the change is simple enough and under control, so merging anyway)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant