We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Token validation is conceptually broken at the moment. Instead, something similar to token introspection should be possible:
var TokenType int const AccessToken tokenType = 1 // in handler / validation strategy fosite.Introspect(token string) (fosite.Requester, error) fosite.IntrospectStrict(token string, tt tokenType) (fosite.Requester, error)
Both iterate through all validators and return true if one of them validated successfully
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
handler: flatten packages closes #70
f41216c
openid: don't autogrant openid scope - closes #68 all: clean up scopes / arguments - closes #66 all: composable factories - closes #64 all: refactor token validation - closes #63 all: remove mandatory scope - closes #62
a92c755
all: composable factories, better token validation, better scope hand…
9c4e58e
…ling and simplify structure * readme: add gitter chat badge closes ory#67 * handler: flatten packages closes ory#70 * openid: don't autogrant openid scope - closes ory#68 * all: clean up scopes / arguments - closes ory#66 * all: composable factories - closes ory#64 * all: refactor token validation - closes ory#63 * all: remove mandatory scope - closes ory#62
aeneasr
No branches or pull requests
Token validation is conceptually broken at the moment. Instead, something similar to token introspection should be possible:
Both iterate through all validators and return true if one of them validated successfully
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: