Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consent: Investigate if prompt=none should be allowed with implicit flows #866

Closed
aeneasr opened this issue May 20, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed
Labels
feat New feature or request. package/consent
Milestone

Comments

@aeneasr
Copy link
Member

aeneasr commented May 20, 2018

Currently, implicit flows and public clients always require consent but it seems that this is not according to spec. Let's investigate this and find if it's required or not.

@aeneasr aeneasr added feat New feature or request. package/consent labels May 20, 2018
@aeneasr aeneasr added this to the 1.0.0-alpha.1 milestone May 20, 2018
@aeneasr
Copy link
Member Author

aeneasr commented May 24, 2018

@aeneasr
Copy link
Member Author

aeneasr commented May 24, 2018

Solved on master

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feat New feature or request. package/consent
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant