Remove statusline #289
Merged
Remove statusline #289
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For v1.0 I want to make sure every existing feature is justified (being used) and have all the necessary features (e.g. config field fields).
I believe stauts line is one of the features that no one uses, because it's currently painful to use. You need to enable it manually every time you run tiny because we never implemented the config file fields. Also, I think it's not too useful. It shows three things:
First one is already shown in the TUI always, no need to show it again. (2) and (3) can be seen by running the commands and I'm not sure if they're important enough to show always.
(I think a more helpful status line would show: channel status and topic, maybe number of nicks in the channel)
Instead of finishing a feature that no one uses I think it makes more sense to just remove it. No need to maintain dead code.
I'll keep this here for a few weeks in case anyone will object.