Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: test both quay.io/centos-bootc/{centos,fedora}-bootc:{eln,stream9} #148

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

mvo5
Copy link
Collaborator

@mvo5 mvo5 commented Jan 22, 2024

Now that bib supports both fedora and centos bootc we need to start testing both as part of the integration suite.

@mvo5 mvo5 force-pushed the buildroot-from-container-test-stream9 branch from 029977c to 427b747 Compare January 22, 2024 16:44
@mvo5 mvo5 force-pushed the buildroot-from-container-test-stream9 branch 6 times, most recently from 4e67b59 to f9c5f6f Compare January 25, 2024 20:18
@mvo5 mvo5 marked this pull request as ready for review January 25, 2024 20:37
@mvo5 mvo5 marked this pull request as draft January 26, 2024 10:45
@mvo5 mvo5 force-pushed the buildroot-from-container-test-stream9 branch 5 times, most recently from 78d4c66 to 8d540f9 Compare January 26, 2024 14:06
@mvo5 mvo5 marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2024 14:46
@mvo5 mvo5 force-pushed the buildroot-from-container-test-stream9 branch from 8d540f9 to e3074f9 Compare January 26, 2024 14:48
@mvo5 mvo5 force-pushed the buildroot-from-container-test-stream9 branch 4 times, most recently from f2c3ac9 to 5f5f8c6 Compare January 29, 2024 10:44
@mvo5 mvo5 force-pushed the buildroot-from-container-test-stream9 branch from 5f5f8c6 to 7cd7879 Compare February 3, 2024 07:40
Copy link
Member

@achilleas-k achilleas-k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Minor nitpick: the commit message subject is a bit too long (by 5 chars).
Maybe it'll be both shorter and clearer if it read:

test: run tests with both fedora and centos images

test both quay.io/centos-bootc/centos-bootc:stream9 and quay.io/centos-bootc/fedora-bootc:eln
...

Test both `quay.io/centos-bootc/{centos,fedora}-bootc:{eln,stream9}`,
now that `bib` supports both fedora and centos bootc we need to start
testing both as part of the integration suite.

Note that not all combinations are tested to save time, it's a
tradeoff and trivial enough to tweak.
@mvo5 mvo5 force-pushed the buildroot-from-container-test-stream9 branch from 7cd7879 to 4386d5d Compare February 6, 2024 10:55
@mvo5
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mvo5 commented Feb 6, 2024

LGTM. Minor nitpick: the commit message subject is a bit too long (by 5 chars). Maybe it'll be both shorter and clearer if it read:

test: run tests with both fedora and centos images

test both quay.io/centos-bootc/centos-bootc:stream9 and quay.io/centos-bootc/fedora-bootc:eln
...

Excellent point - I updated the commit now following this suggestion.

@mvo5 mvo5 enabled auto-merge February 6, 2024 10:55
achilleas-k
achilleas-k previously approved these changes Feb 6, 2024
Copy link
Member

@achilleas-k achilleas-k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@mvo5 mvo5 force-pushed the buildroot-from-container-test-stream9 branch from 76476b3 to 23f5b13 Compare February 6, 2024 16:47
@mvo5 mvo5 force-pushed the buildroot-from-container-test-stream9 branch 2 times, most recently from 73b63ed to 560c5e5 Compare February 6, 2024 21:44
We are running out of disk space on the GH runners so we need to
be more aggressive about cleanups.
@mvo5 mvo5 force-pushed the buildroot-from-container-test-stream9 branch from 560c5e5 to 9d8f2dc Compare February 7, 2024 05:42
@mvo5 mvo5 added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 7, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Feb 7, 2024
@mvo5 mvo5 added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 7, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Feb 7, 2024
@achilleas-k
Copy link
Member

Is this obsolete now?

@mvo5
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mvo5 commented Feb 7, 2024

This is merged indirectly via #178

@mvo5 mvo5 closed this Feb 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants