Add or update repository

[brettcurtis]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced CodeRabbit configuration for advanced features like early access, review workflows, auto-reviews, and chat auto-reply.
• Chores
  • Updated workflow conditions for better automation handling.
  • Upgraded pre-commit hooks to enhance code quality checks.
  • Expanded cloud infrastructure configurations to include new services and access controls.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent updates introduce significant enhancements across the project's configuration and infrastructure. A new configuration file for CodeRabbit has been added, enabling advanced features such as early access and automated workflows. The production workflow has been refined to adjust job execution conditions. The pre-commit configuration now reflects updated repository revisions and a streamlined hook setup. Additionally, the project's Terraform variables have been expanded to include configurations for Google Cloud services, indicating a broader integration with cloud resources.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
.coderabbit.yaml	Introduced configuration settings for advanced features like early access and automated workflows.
.github/workflows/production.yml	Adjusted job execution condition from excluding dependabot[bot] to excluding osinfra-sa.
.pre-commit-config.yaml	Updated repository revision for pre-commit-terraform and removed no-commit-to-branch hook.
global/infra/tfvars/production.tfvars	Added Google Cloud services configuration, including descriptions, topics, and push restrictions.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 97edbde and f6d43ff.

Files selected for processing (4)

• .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/production.yml (1 hunks)
• .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
• global/infra/tfvars/production.tfvars (3 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• .pre-commit-config.yaml

Additional comments: 5

.coderabbit.yaml (1)

• 6-13: The configuration in .coderabbit.yaml looks well-structured and follows YAML best practices. It successfully enables early access, review workflows, auto-reviews, and chat auto-reply functionality as intended. Ensure that the poem setting under reviews is intentionally set to false, as this might disable any poem-related features if they exist.

.github/workflows/production.yml (1)

• 21-21: The change in the condition for executing the global_infra job from excluding 'dependabot[bot]' to 'osinfra-sa' seems to align with a shift in automation strategy. Ensure that this change accurately reflects the desired behavior for infrastructure management and security policies, and that 'osinfra-sa' is the correct actor to exclude from triggering this job.

Verification successful

---

The findings indicate that 'osinfra-sa' is mentioned in a Terraform variables file, suggesting its role in infrastructure management. The exclusion of 'osinfra-sa' from triggering the global_infra job in the GitHub Actions workflow appears to be a security measure to prevent automated infrastructure changes by this service account. It's important to ensure that such exclusions are well-documented and reviewed for their impact on automation strategies and security policies. Without explicit documentation or additional context, the rationale behind this exclusion seems thoughtful but requires careful consideration.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that 'osinfra-sa' is the intended actor to exclude and that no necessary workflows are inadvertently blocked by this change.
echo "Manual verification needed to confirm 'osinfra-sa' actor exclusion is appropriate."

Length of output: 180

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search the repository for mentions of 'osinfra-sa' to understand its role and relevance.
rg 'osinfra-sa'

Length of output: 68

global/infra/tfvars/production.tfvars (3)

• 350-365: The addition of "google-cloud-services" in the production.tfvars file is well-defined, with appropriate descriptions and topics that align with the intended use of Google Cloud Platform services. Ensure that the push_restrictions are correctly set to "osinfra-io/platform-google-cloud-landing-zone" to maintain the desired access control.
• 748-748: The reference to "google-cloud-services" in the team_children section under platform-google-cloud-landing-zone-repository-admins is correctly added. This ensures that the new Google Cloud services are appropriately managed within the team structure.
• 922-922: The inclusion of "google-cloud-services" in the team_parents section for platform-google-cloud-landing-zone is appropriate, ensuring that the new services are integrated into the team's responsibilities and review processes.