Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Request images from OSIP 6" in EPSG:3857
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
h/t @iandees
  • Loading branch information
@bhousel
bhousel committed Jan 15, 2019
1 parent 2a4ec28 commit 95680b2
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions sources/north-america/us/oh/Ohio_OSIP_6in.geojson
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
"properties": {
"name": "OSIP 6in Imagery Most Current Available",
"type": "wms",
"url": "https://geo.oit.ohio.gov/arcgis/rest/services/OSIP/OSIP_6in_best_avail/ImageServer/exportImage?f=image&bbox={bbox}&imageSR=4326&bboxSR=4326&SR={proj}&size={width}%2C{height}",
"url": "https://geo.oit.ohio.gov/arcgis/rest/services/OSIP/OSIP_6in_best_avail/ImageServer/exportImage?f=image&bbox={bbox}&imageSR=3857&bboxSR=4326&SR={proj}&size={width}%2C{height}",

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

Copy link
@1ec5

1ec5 Jan 15, 2019

Member

Is it correct that the imageSR and bboxSR would differ in this case? Also, should EPSG:3857 be listed under available_projections?

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

Copy link
@iandees

iandees Jan 15, 2019

Member

For iD, the bounding box will be in 4326 and the image will be displayed in 3857, so these values are correct. I'm not sure how JOSM handles the interaction – listing both 4326 and 3857 might confuse things, so I'd suggest only listing 3857.

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

Copy link
@don-vip

don-vip Jan 16, 2019

Collaborator

Fixed it differently in JOSM.
"min_zoom": 1,
"max_zoom": 22,
"permission_osm": "implicit",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -913,4 +913,4 @@
]
]
}
}
}

0 comments on commit 95680b2

Please sign in to comment.