-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 592
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove wasm times from our antehandler checkTx + recheckTx stack #8308
Conversation
Important Notice This PR modifies an in-repo Go module. It is one of:
The dependent Go modules, especially the root one, will have to be Please follow the instructions below:
Please let us know if you need any help. |
WalkthroughThe recent updates enhance efficiency and logic flow in handling IBC transactions. Conditional checks were added in Changes
Tip New Features and ImprovementsReview SettingsIntroduced new personality profiles for code reviews. Users can now select between "Chill" and "Assertive" review tones to tailor feedback styles according to their preferences. The "Assertive" profile posts more comments and nitpicks the code more aggressively, while the "Chill" profile is more relaxed and posts fewer comments. AST-based InstructionsCodeRabbit offers customizing reviews based on the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) pattern matching. Read more about AST-based instructions in the documentation. Community-driven AST-based RulesWe are kicking off a community-driven initiative to create and share AST-based rules. Users can now contribute their AST-based rules to detect security vulnerabilities, code smells, and anti-patterns. Please see the ast-grep-essentials repository for more information. New Static Analysis ToolsWe are continually expanding our support for static analysis tools. We have added support for Tone SettingsUsers can now customize CodeRabbit to review code in the style of their favorite characters or personalities. Here are some of our favorite examples:
Revamped Settings PageWe have redesigned the settings page for a more intuitive layout, enabling users to find and adjust settings quickly. This change was long overdue; it not only improves the user experience but also allows our development team to add more settings in the future with ease. Going forward, the changes to Miscellaneous
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Additional Context UsedMarkdownlint (9)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
CHANGELOG.md (4)
Line range hint
394-394
: Consider removing the trailing punctuation in the heading for consistency.-## [v6.4.0]. +## [v6.4.0]
Line range hint
657-657
: Avoid using bare URLs. Provide descriptive text for hyperlinks for better readability and SEO.Would you like me to generate the markdown code to replace these bare URLs with descriptive text links?
Also applies to: 715-715
Line range hint
1055-1055
: Ensure heading levels increment by only one level at a time for proper document structure and accessibility.Consider adjusting the heading levels accordingly.
Also applies to: 1067-1067, 1076-1076, 1081-1081, 1133-1133
Line range hint
1296-1296
: Ensure that there are no empty links in the document to improve accessibility and user experience.- [v6.4.0]() + [v6.4.0](link-to-the-specific-section-or-external-resource)
spellcheck failure is unrelated to this PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This may mean that we include more "bad" txs in the blocks as we don't reject them from the mempool, but that should be fine. An example would be a cross chain swap that has a bad price
but that was never the job of CheckTx to do, e.g. thats not done for swaps! For Cross-chain swaps, you actually want those to get in, to unlock funds from the sender chain faster. |
* Remove wasm times from our antehandler checkTx + recheckTx stack * add changelog (cherry picked from commit dd8d9c9)
These codepaths get called in checktx and rechecktx, causing notable overhead. This PR removes these.
We should get this into a patch release to significantly improve our spam resistance