-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 592
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[x/concentratedliquidity]: Fix Incorrect Event Emission #8755
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🔇 Additional comments (8)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/concentrated-liquidity/lp.go (1)
Line range hint
435-452
: Consider Modifying the Position Without Full WithdrawalThe current implementation of
addToPosition
withdraws the full position and creates a new one with the added liquidity. This approach may introduce rounding errors and is less efficient due to the overhead of withdrawing and recreating positions.Consider refactoring the logic to add liquidity directly to the existing position without full withdrawal. This can be achieved by updating the position's liquidity and state in place, which would:
- Reduce the potential for rounding errors caused by withdrawal and re-deposit.
- Improve performance by minimizing state changes and event emissions.
- Simplify the logic by eliminating the need to handle withdrawal and re-creation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- x/concentrated-liquidity/lp.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
x/concentrated-liquidity/lp.go (1)
461-461
: Good Fix: Include Pool ID in Event EmissionBy adding
sdk.NewAttribute(types.AttributeKeyPoolId, strconv.FormatUint(pool.GetId(), 10))
, the emitted event now correctly includes thepoolId
. This ensures that event listeners receive accurate and complete information, improving traceability and auditing of pool-related events.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yikes, thanks for fixing
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you! |
Closes: #XXX
What is the purpose of the change
Minor fix on incorrect event emission
Testing and Verifying
This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
Documentation and Release Note
Unreleased
section ofCHANGELOG.md
?Where is the change documented?
x/{module}/README.md
)