chore: Add a VCS / path curation for flexmark-util
#154
Conversation
| - id: "Maven:com.vladsch.flexmark:flexmark-util" | ||
| curations: | ||
| comment: | | ||
| No sources artifact published and no <scm> tag in POM. Repository found via Internet search. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would it make sense to drop "No sources artifact published" as irrelevant? Maybe also "Repository found via Internet search." ?
idea: we could align on "The package metadata lacks the VCS info." ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've reused the wording from the existing https://github.com/oss-review-toolkit/ort-config/blob/main/curations/Maven/com.vladsch.flexmark/flexmark-all.yml which I wanted to align with.
I believe it's not irrelevant that no sources artifact is published, otherwise the question could arise why it's not being used. This makes more clear that fixing the VCS info is our only option, even for users that have configured ORT to prefer source artifacts over VCS locations.
Anyway, whatever wording change we eventually do in the end, it should be applied to flexmark-all, too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would it make sense to drop "No sources artifact published" as irrelevant? Maybe also "Repository found via Internet search." ?
After our discussion, I've dropped the first sentence but kept the second, as to me it's important to explain how a conclusion / curation was achieved. That would be unclear when just stating "The package metadata lacks the VCS info".
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian@doubleopen.org>
sschuberth
force-pushed
the
flexmark-util-vcs
branch
from
2ce2f93
to
b21872a
Compare
No description provided.