-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
License texts for +
variants of SPDX licenses
#5004
Labels
Comments
sschuberth
added
enhancement
Issues that are considered to be enhancements
scanner
About the scanner tool
labels
Jan 28, 2022
mnonnenmacher
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 10, 2022
Ignore the '+' flag when getting the license text of an SPDX license. For example, for the id 'Apache-2.0+' return the license text for 'Apache-2.0'. This is valid, because in the example 'Apache-2.0' is a valid license for the expression. Choosing a later version of the license should be implemented as an extension of the license choice feature. Fixes #5004. Signed-off-by: Martin Nonnenmacher <martin.nonnenmacher@bosch.io>
@mmurto This was discussed in the developer meeting today and the consensus was that it should be implemented as suggested. |
mnonnenmacher
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 10, 2022
Ignore the '+' operator when getting the license text of an SPDX license. For example, for the id 'Apache-2.0+' return the license text for 'Apache-2.0'. This is valid, because in the example 'Apache-2.0' is a valid license for the expression. Choosing a later version of the license should be implemented as an extension of the license choice feature. Fixes #5004. Signed-off-by: Martin Nonnenmacher <martin.nonnenmacher@bosch.io>
mnonnenmacher
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 10, 2022
Ignore the '+' operator when getting the license text of an SPDX license. For example, for the id 'Apache-2.0+' return the license text for 'Apache-2.0'. This is valid, because in the example 'Apache-2.0' is a valid license for the expression. Choosing a later version of the license should be implemented as an extension of the license choice feature. Fixes #5004. Signed-off-by: Martin Nonnenmacher <martin.nonnenmacher@bosch.io>
mnonnenmacher
added
spdx-utils
About the SPDX utility library
and removed
scanner
About the scanner tool
labels
Feb 10, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
ORT currently provides license text for license identifiers on the SPDX license list for notice generation with Reporter. No license text is provided for SPDX licenses with
+
identifier; for example, a license expressionLPPL-1.0+
does not produce any license text for the notice files.Should the non-plus variant of the license be used for the plus variants?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: