Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ [Check split]: Binary-Artifacts #1244

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Nov 16, 2021
Merged

Conversation

laurentsimon
Copy link
Contributor

@laurentsimon laurentsimon commented Nov 12, 2021

See #1245:

  1. the raw data collection: under checks/worker
  2. the score/policy evaluation: under checks/evaluation
  3. definition of structures for raw data structure: under checks/raw

Note: I've separated raw and worker simply because the structures will eventually be made public so I would like to have them all in one place... like C header files :-) An alternative solution would be to have both the data collection and the structure definition under raw and define each structure in the check that uses them. wdut?

no breaking changes

@laurentsimon laurentsimon changed the title ✨ [Check split]: Binary-Artifacts ✨ DRAFT [Check split]: Binary-Artifacts Nov 12, 2021
@laurentsimon laurentsimon marked this pull request as draft November 12, 2021 00:46
@laurentsimon laurentsimon marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2021 00:52
@laurentsimon laurentsimon changed the title ✨ DRAFT [Check split]: Binary-Artifacts ✨ [Check split]: Binary-Artifacts Nov 12, 2021
checks/raw/binary_artifacts.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
checks/worker/binary_artifact.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
checks/worker/binary_artifact.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
checks/worker/file_utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@laurentsimon
Copy link
Contributor Author

laurentsimon commented Nov 15, 2021

Any other comment on this PR? Otherwise, can I get an LGTM :-)
Thanks!

@laurentsimon laurentsimon merged commit cc49494 into ossf:main Nov 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants