The first and only true Functional Reactive Programming framework for Scala.
How can we say it's the first true FRP framework for Scala? In all other frameworks they add special framework-specific
functions to do things like math (ex. adding two variables together with a special +
method), collection building (ex. a
special implementation of :::
to concatenate two variables containing lists), or similar mechanisms to Scala's built-in
collection manipulation (ex. map
). These are great and mostly fill in the gaps necessary to solve your problems. But
the goal for Reactify was a bit loftier. We set out to create a system that actually allows you to use ANY Scala
functionality just like you would normally without any special magic (like Scala.rx's special operations require:
https://github.com/lihaoyi/scala.rx#additional-operations).
In Reactify you just write code like you normally would and as used Var
s and Val
s change the reactive properties they
have been assigned to will update as well. If you need a bit more clarification on just what the heck we mean, jump ahead
to the More AdvancedExamples.
reactify is published to Sonatype OSS and Maven Central currently supporting:
- Scala, Scala.js, and Scala Native (2.11, 2.12, 2.13, 3.x)
Configuring the dependency in SBT simply requires:
libraryDependencies += "com.outr" %% "reactify" % "4.1.3"
or, for Scala.js / Scala Native / cross-building:
libraryDependencies += "com.outr" %%% "reactify" % "4.1.3"
This framework is intentionally meant to be a simplistic take on properties and functional reactive concepts. There are only four specific classes that really need be understood to take advantage of the framework:
- Reactive - As the name suggests it is a simple trait that fires values that may be reacted to by
Reaction
s. - Channel - The most simplistic representation of a
Reactive
, simply provides a public:=
to fire events. No state is maintained. - Val - Exactly as it is in Scala, this is a final variable. What is defined at construction is immutable. However, the
contents of the value, if they are
Reactive
may change the ultimate value of this, so it is isReactive
itself and holds state. - Var - Similar to
Val
except it is mutable as it mixes inChannel
to allow setting of the current value.
Val
and Var
may hold formulas with Reactive
s. These Reactive
s are listened to when assigned so the wrapping
Val
or Var
will also fire an appropriate event. This allows complex values to be built off of other variables.
Props is a very simple framework and though you'll likely want access to some of the implicit conversions made available in the package, everything can be had with a single import:
import reactify._
As discussed in the concepts there are only four major classes in Props (Reactive
, Channel
, Val
, and Var
). Of
those classes, unless you are creating a custom Reactive
you will probably only deal with the latter three.
Creating instances is incredibly simple:
val myChannel = Channel[String] // Creates a Channel that receives Strings
val myVar = Var[Int](5) // Creates a Var containing the explicit value `5`
val myVal = Val[Int](myVar + 5) // Create a Val containing the sum of `myVar` + `5`
This would all be pretty pointless if we didn't have the capacity to listen to changes on the values. Here we're going
to listen to myVal
and println
the new value when it changes:
myVal.attach { newValue =>
println(s"myVal = $newValue")
}
Since myVal
is a Val
it is immutable itself, but its value is derived from the formula myVar + 5
. This means that
a change to myVar
will cause the value of myVal
to change as a result:
myVar := 10
The above code modifies myVar
to have the new value of 10
. This will also cause myVal
to re-evaluate and have the
new value of 15
(myVar + 5
). As a result, the observer we attached above will output:
myVal = 15
You can do clever things like define a value that is derived from other values:
val a = Var("One")
val b = Var("Two")
val c = Var("Three")
val list = Val(List(a, b, c))
list() // Outputs List("One", "Two", "Three")
a := "Uno"
b := "Dos"
c := "Tres"
list() // Outputs List("Uno", "Dos", "Tres")
This is all pretty neat, but it's the more complex scenarios that show the power of what you can do with Reactify:
val v1 = Var(10)
val v2 = Var("Yes")
val v3 = Var("No")
val complex = Val[String] {
if (v1 > 10) {
v2
} else {
v3
}
}
Any changes to v1
, v2
, or v3
will fire a change on complex
and the entire inlined function will be re-evaluated.
A much more advanced scenario is when you have a Var
that contains a class
that has a Var
and you want to keep track
of the resulting value no matter what the first Var
's instance is currently set to.
Consider the following two classes:
class Foo {
val active: Var[Boolean] = Var(false)
}
class Bar {
val foo: Var[Option[Foo]] = Var[Option[Foo]](None)
}
A Bar
has a Var
foo
that holds an Option[Foo]
. Now, say I have a Var[Option[Bar]]
:
val bar: Var[Option[Bar]] = Var[Option[Bar]](None)
If we want to determine active
on Foo
we have several layers of mutability between the optional bar
Var
, the
optional foo
Var
, and then the ultimate active
Var
in Foo
. For a one-off we could do something like:
val active: Boolean = bar().flatMap(_.foo().map(_.active())).getOrElse(false)
This would give us true
only if there is a Bar
, Bar
has a Foo
, and active
is true. But, if we want to listen
for when that changes at any level (Bar
, Foo
, and active
) it should be just as easy. Fortunately with Reactify it
is:
val active: Val[Boolean] = Val(bar().flatMap(_.foo().map(_.active())).getOrElse(false))
Yep, it's that easy. Now if I set bar
to Some(new Bar)
then foo := Some(new Foo)
on that, and finally set active
to true on Foo
my active
Val
will fire that it has changed. Reactify will monitor every level of the Var
s and
automatically update itself and fire when the resulting value from the function above has changed.
// Monitor the value change
active.attach { b =>
... do something ...
}
// Set Bar
val b = new Bar
bar := Some(b)
// Set Foo
val f = new Foo
b.foo := Some(f)
// Set active
f.active := true
With Reactify you don't have to do any magic in your code, you just write Scala code the way you always have and let Reactify handle the magic.
As we saw above, Var
and Val
retain the state of the value assigned to them. A Channel
on the other hand is like a
Var
(in that you can set values to it), but no state is retained. This is useful for representing firing of events or
some other action that is meant to be observed but not stored.
The core functionality is complete and useful, but we can build upon it for numeric values that are dependent on other
numeric values or numeric values that may have multiple representations. For example, consider a graphical element on
screen. It may have a left
position for the X value originating on the left side of the element, but if we want to
right-align something we have to make sure we account for the width in doing so and vice-versa for determining the right
edge. We can simplify things by leveraging a Dep
instance to represent it:
val width: Var[Double] = Var(0.0)
val left: Var[Double] = Var(0.0)
val center: Dep[Double, Double] = Dep(left)(_ + (width / 2.0), _ - (width / 2.0))
val right: Dep[Double, Double] = Dep(left)(_ + width, _ - width)
Notice we've even added a center
representation. These are dependent on left
but their value is derived from a
formula based on left
and width
. Of course, if representing the value alone were all we care about then a simple
Val(left + width)
could be used as our right
value, but we also want to be able to modify center
or right
and
have it properly reflect in left
. Any changes made to Dep
will properly update the variable it depends on left
in
this case. See DepsSpec
for more detailed examples.
Dep
also supports conversions between different types as well.
As of 1.6 you can now do two-way binding incredibly easily:
val a = Var[String]("Hello")
val b = Var[String]("World")
val binding = a bind b
By default, this will assign the value of a
to b
and then changes to either will propagate to the other. If you want
to detach the binding:
binding.detach()
This will disconnect the two to operate independently of each other again.
You can also do different typed binding:
implicit val s2i: String => Int = (s: String) => Integer.parseInt(s)
implicit val i2s: Int => String = (i: Int) => i.toString
val a = Var[String]("5")
val b = Var[Int](10)
a bind b
We need implicits to be able to convert between the two, but now changes to one will propagate to the other.