Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FEAT: add exports-prefix #103

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 28, 2024
Merged

FEAT: add exports-prefix #103

merged 3 commits into from
May 28, 2024

Conversation

aryan-rajoria
Copy link
Collaborator

Adding feature as specified in #102

@prabhu
Copy link
Member

prabhu commented May 28, 2024

@aryan-rajoria, do you have any example bom generated by this PR?

@aryan-rajoria
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@aryan-rajoria, do you have any example bom generated by this PR?

Yes I created one for a rust application ouch. Ouch github

@prabhu
Copy link
Member

prabhu commented May 28, 2024

Works very well! Tested with --exports-prefix ouch --deep. Can you also include the below change in binary.py (Replace 3 with 2)

if demangled_symbol.count("::") > 2:

Update: Was able to push to your branch directly.

Signed-off-by: Prabhu Subramanian <prabhu@appthreat.com>
@prabhu prabhu linked an issue May 28, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@prabhu prabhu merged commit 5b5b7ad into owasp-dep-scan:main May 28, 2024
29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[sbom] Support for identifying exported symbols
2 participants