Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

graph: Allow PATCH on user without 'mail' in body #3376

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2022

Conversation

rhafer
Copy link
Contributor

@rhafer rhafer commented Mar 23, 2022

Description

Skip the mail validator if 'mail' attribute is not present in the request.

Related Issue

See #3167 (comment)

How Has This Been Tested?

  • manually

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

@rhafer rhafer self-assigned this Mar 23, 2022
Skip the mail validator if 'mail' attribute is not present in the
request.
@rhafer rhafer changed the title graph: Allow PATCH on user with 'mail' in body graph: Allow PATCH on user without 'mail' in body Mar 23, 2022
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 23, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@rhafer rhafer merged commit ec0b3b1 into owncloud:master Mar 29, 2022
ownclouders pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2022
Merge: c34503e 517356f
Author: Ralf Haferkamp <rhaferkamp@owncloud.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 29 10:11:19 2022 +0200

    Merge pull request #3376 from rhafer/graph-user-patch

    graph: Allow PATCH on user without 'mail' in body
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants