Skip to content

Conversation

@Boshen
Copy link
Member

@Boshen Boshen commented Oct 17, 2025

Found this case while working on tsconfig discovered.

Still uncertain about this change but the original test returns not found.

https://github.com/parcel-bundler/parcel/blob/b6224fd519f95e68d8b93ba90376fd94c8b76e69/packages/utils/node-resolver-rs/src/lib.rs#L2372-L2384

It should not pick up any tsconfig while resolving specifier inside node_modules.

Reference:

The webpack plugin has no mention of node_modules but the vite plugin does.

@sapphi-red I'm not confident with this logic overall so assigning you to review.

@Boshen Boshen requested a review from sapphi-red October 17, 2025 01:58
@graphite-app
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Oct 17, 2025

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.19%. Comparing base (dc46713) to head (5654bce).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #760   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.18%   94.19%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines        3028     3031    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         2852     2855    +3     
  Misses        176      176           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 17, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #760 will not alter performance

Comparing 10-17-fix_tsconfig_paths_should_not_be_applied_to_paths_inside_node_modules (5654bce) with main (dc46713)

Summary

✅ 7 untouched
⏩ 2 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 2 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

Copy link
Member

@sapphi-red sapphi-red left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Boshen Boshen added the merge label Oct 17, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

Boshen commented Oct 17, 2025

Merge activity

@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 10-17-fix_tsconfig_paths_should_not_be_applied_to_paths_inside_node_modules branch from c025403 to 5654bce Compare October 17, 2025 05:18
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 5654bce into main Oct 17, 2025
16 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 10-17-fix_tsconfig_paths_should_not_be_applied_to_paths_inside_node_modules branch October 17, 2025 05:22
@Boshen Boshen mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the merge label Oct 17, 2025
@Boshen Boshen mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants