Skip to content

Conversation

@Dunqing
Copy link
Member

@Dunqing Dunqing commented Sep 19, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Member Author

Dunqing commented Sep 19, 2025


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Sep 19, 2025

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #13911 will not alter performance

Comparing 09-19-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tstypeassertion (9b46dd7) with main (0f15ed3)1

Summary

✅ 37 untouched

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (9b46dd7) during the generation of this report, so 0f15ed3 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 09-19-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tstypeassertion branch from 3a6318b to 69805cf Compare September 19, 2025 09:39
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 09-19-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tsintersectiontype branch 2 times, most recently from 2e20a98 to 8565f4c Compare September 19, 2025 13:49
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 09-19-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tstypeassertion branch from 69805cf to 0f036bb Compare September 19, 2025 13:49
@Dunqing Dunqing marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2025 13:49
@leaysgur leaysgur self-assigned this Sep 22, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 09-19-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tsintersectiontype branch from 8565f4c to 892528a Compare September 22, 2025 04:14
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 09-19-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tstypeassertion branch from 0f036bb to 1c116ee Compare September 22, 2025 04:14
@leaysgur leaysgur added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Sep 22, 2025
Copy link
Member

leaysgur commented Sep 22, 2025

Merge activity

@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 09-19-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tsintersectiontype branch from 892528a to 5710b13 Compare September 22, 2025 04:24
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 09-19-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tstypeassertion branch from 1c116ee to 9b46dd7 Compare September 22, 2025 04:25
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Sep 22, 2025
Base automatically changed from 09-19-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tsintersectiontype to main September 22, 2025 04:30
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 9b46dd7 into main Sep 22, 2025
26 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 09-19-feat_formatter_implement_formatting_for_tstypeassertion branch September 22, 2025 04:31
@Boshen Boshen mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-formatter Area - Formatter C-enhancement Category - New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants