Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docs(transformer): comment on RegExp transform for potential improvement #5514

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2024
Merged

docs(transformer): comment on RegExp transform for potential improvement #5514

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2024

Commits on Sep 6, 2024

  1. docs(transformer): comment on RegExp transform for potential improvem… 

    …ent (#5514)

I think it's correct that we could do better here. Or is there some difference in behavior between `RegExp(...)` and `new RegExp(...)`?
    @overlookmotel
    overlookmotel committed Sep 6, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    9282647 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history