Consolidate copy and approach to toast copy

[benjaminleonard]

We're a little inconsistent with toast copy and CTAs at the moment. We should do a pass on consolidating them all. E.g. settling on capitalisation, use of quotes, and when to link to the resource that has been created / modified.

[charliepark]

A few additional inconsistencies to think through:

• In most places, we say "Your {noun} has been {pastParticipled}" (e.g. Your VPC has been deleted), but I think the assigning of implicit ownership is a bit off, and "VPC deleted" or "VPC successfully deleted" would be better.
• On that point, "VPC updated" vs. "VPC successfully updated" — "successfully" is probably redundant / obvious there, though it maybe gives a subtle bit of psychic confidence? (Ah, yup. It did the thing. I succeeded. Gold star for me.) I'm ambivalent on that, but probably lean towards including 'successfully' on the created and updated toasts, but leaving it off for deleted?
• In some place we name the resource (${data.name} has been promoted); in others we don't (Your VPC has been updated).
  • Clever trick to name the resource when deleting it shown here

[david-crespo]

Agree on all points! I say scrap "successfully" always.

[charliepark]

Thoughts on

Success
arch-202-06-01 has been deleted

vs.

Success
Image deleted

?

[benjaminleonard]

I like including the resource name – it makes the action much clearer and reassures the user